[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 minute ago

I think I may have always mispronounced one or both of these then.

Man, English pronunciation, I swear.

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Hmm, it is similar to a J, and may become the same depending on the speaker, but not necessarily exactly the same

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Ooh wow you're right.

Close to me is "closs"

Close the door is "cloz"

I never noticed

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

Close isn't always pronounced the same?!

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

Assuming it's just like a Steam Deck without the screen, how would that compare to popular controllers like consoles first-party ones or 8bitdo's offerings?

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

My doctor did 10, 20, 30, 40, and I ended up going back to 30 to reduce the tachycardia. I weigh 74 kg.

Maybe we're just really different people. Or maybe my doctor is just really really careful

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Switch is fantastic for what it is. Sure, it's anemic and old, but it's a creative design that more or less created a whole product category and allows for very creative gameplay.

They did push their luck a bit with BOTW and especially TOTK, regarding performance, sure. But most of the time, you really don't need incredible processing power to play a Nintendo game. They're overdue for a Switch 2 (I suspect they planned to release that much earlier but a combination of the pandemic and higher sustained sales than anticipated changed their plans), but I really don't think most of their consoles can be considered mistakes.

IMO Nintendo brings something different and it's very much okay that it exists.

What I'm actually doubtful about is Xbox and Sony. Those are just PC-controller combos, made cheap through standardisation, high volumes and loss-leader tactics, essentially. Microsoft and, to a lesser but similar degree, Sony, are the ones I'm not convinced provide the world with much value by making consoles.

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
  • there are lots of different drugs, and not all of them work on everyone. You may have to try several until you find one that works well and doesn't have too many undesirable effects on you.
  • usually they start you on a low dose and increase gradually, kind of similarly to how they do for antidepressants. So you won't really feel the full effect right away. Though starting with 30 mg of lisdexamfetamine is kinda intense. Unless you're a properly massive individual, I'm amazed the doctor just went there straight away. You could've had really unpleasant cardiac side effects. Glad it doesn't seem like you did.
  • it's not like cocaine. The effect is supposed to be relatively subtle if it's right for you.
[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Have you tried brush-gloves? The idea is that they allow you to brush your pet every time you pet them. Having several in every room where you're likely to spend time with your cat could be the key to brushing more while not feeling like you do.

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

A lot of authoritarian governments are/were elected though.

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Both are young. I think that's about it.

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

I used to do it a lot as a teenager. For everything in my life. Now much less. I wonder why.

27
submitted 1 month ago by Eiri@lemmy.ca to c/lemmy_support@lemmy.ml

One thing I liked (and sometimes disliked) about Reddit was that my feed was a mix of posts in communities I'd joined and a few suggestions of posts from subs The Algorithm™ thought I might like.

On Lemmy I'm realizing I'm starting to fall into a bit of an echo chamber situation because I basically only see stuff I'm already a member of, unless I explicitly go to All or scroll the list of communities.

Are there less involved (lazy) ways of discovering new stuff and broadening my horizons a bit?

67
submitted 2 months ago by Eiri@lemmy.ca to c/askscience@lemmy.world

Sometimes, when I'm really cold, it can take over an hour to warm me up, even with a heating blanket. The quickest solution, a hot shower, feels really inefficient with all the heat going down the drain.

That got me thinking about microwaves. They heat food (partly) from the inside, contrary to simple infrared radiation.

Could we safely do that with people?

I found a Reddit thread where a non-lethal weapon and people getting eye damage because they stayed too long in front of a radar dish.

Could some sort of device be made that would warm specific areas (say, a hand or a leg) without endangering sensitive areas like the eyes?

Would it actually warm someone up from the inside? Would it be possible to make it safe?

Would it present advantages in cases of hypothermia, compared to heated IV fluids?

143

I don't see how it's a benefit to capitalism or companies or, well, anyone, really, to allow people to make thousands of trades a day for minute profits on each.

My gut feeling is that the stock market would not suffer, and less resources would be wasted, if trades and updates to stock prices were limited to, say, one batch per hour.

There are probably reasons the system is the way it is though.

view more: next ›

Eiri

joined 2 months ago