FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't have much faith anyone in power will care. Just not bothering with questions of legality seems to be their modus operandii.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

I predict Elon Musk will be the next president.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 78 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

America is too dependent on tech developed and operated by the american military?!

the fuck?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are you telling me california is the undying lands?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

This article is focused on reading them electrically.

I too have heard you can read flash storage with electron microscopes.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How is the hammer supposed to help me memorize the key?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 21 points 1 week ago

do you mean github or do you actually mean git?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

md5 for example is already vulnerable. People have figured out how to manipulate data into having a pre-specified hash. Meaning someone could engineer deliberate hash collisions and serve you any file they like.

SHA-256 doesn't (i think) have this issue, so far hah.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

you have to fucking hope no one figures out how to backwards engineer the hashing algorithm you choose

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago

precisely, which is why they cannot lie, just respond with no real grasp of wether what they output is truth or falsehoods.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

everything is semantics.

Lying is telling a falsehood intentionally

LLM's clearly lack the prerequisite intentionality

view more: ‹ prev next ›