I don't see why you couldn't have relations in a object model database. Just allow fields that are references to other objects or their keys.
FizzyOrange
I would teach Typescript. Being able to write the types down and hover things to see what types they are will definitely help them.
I think C would put them off. I also wouldn't go with Python, in case they want to do things like write games or make websites, which are common tasks you can do with Typescript but not very well with Python.
ORMs are a pain and so is hand rolling SQL queries and doing the mapping manually.
I definitely think there's scope for NoSQL databases where the database "shape" matches the normal struct style of programming languages. Kind of like how JSON does and XML doesn't.
But it seems like all we got was MongoDB and Firebase which are both shit.
Are there any good NoSQL databases? MongoDB and Firebase don't even have schemas.
You don't need ORMs to prevent SQL injection. Prepared statements have existed for decades.
I always like "by example"s for learning languages - here's Rust's.
I'd probably make a project with it. Maybe a CLI tool using clap_derive and some crate that does something neat that you want to do. Depends what you're interested in I guess.
I wouldn't recommend trying to do leetcode problems with Rust because they are obsessed with linked lists and linked lists are awkward in Rust.
Also I wouldn't recommend making a game or GUI app with Rust yet since the ecosystems there are immature.
A microcontroller project using Embassy is probably a fun way to learn too but I haven't actually tried it yet.
How does it integrate Slack and WhatsApp, given they don't have official APIs? All reverse engineered?
Well they're open source so we're not losing them yet. Especially with uv, it's pretty clear that it is such a vast improvement over the clusterfuck of pip that a community fork is virtually guaranteed if it is ever necessary.
Yeah I feel like it was more than 3 years ago but I guess it's been a long 3 years!
Yeah I think the reputation was probably deserved early in Rust's life, but as time has gone on it has gotten a lot easier to write, especially with the non-lexical lifetimes update 3 years ago.
It's better than nothing but it really only drags Bash from "your code is definitely horribly broken" to "your code is probably broken". Nothing like Rust!
Yeah I know, but if you really mean that analogy then the conclusion is that the normal thing for 99% of programmers to do should be to use AI. In the same way that 99% of people do not get around by running.
I don't agree with that yet - so far I've found AI to be a very fast but mediocre programmer. Kind of like giving a beginner access to all the documentation and a time machine. Sometimes that's exactly what you want. But definitely not most of the time.
Python's performance is too poor to do anything serious. Go and look at the screenshots from Pygame. They look like ZX Spectrum era games.
Compare that to something like PixiJS.