Jrockwar

Hell no, leave us gays alone - between Altman and Thiel we have more than enough gay evillionaires!

FR, I had a £4k top spec one, Intel i9, 64GB as my work laptop... And even back then, I wouldn't have bought it myself for £800 if given the chance. Absolutely atrocious, particularly in terms of thermal design. I remember one summer, having Intel vTune installed and seeing the CPU laptop throttle to 0.25 GHz with Zoom open, because it would wake up the power hungry GPU and the laptop couldn't deal with a British 30°C summer.

The Apple Silicon ones are lovely in comparison. When I swapped it, I remember going through a whole flight using my laptop without charging thinking "what sorcery is this".

Shame there isn't a decent equivalent ARM laptop that can do Linux.

I wish they had a flagship. I would be able to accept compromises of course - thicker, more expensive... But still with top notch components.

There are two things stopping me:

The first one is that for the first time ever, I have a phone that I can just about take on a holiday, not take my DSLR, and not regret the decision. I reckon different people have different thresholds for this, but for me this bar sits at the recent crop of 1" camera sensors (maybe from 1-3 years ago, like Xiaomi 13U/14U, Vivo X100, etc).

The second one is that I tend to get flagships as a way to guarantee some longevity when doing some resource intensive tasks. I consider myself a power user, and while it's true that phones have plenty of horsepower these days, there are tasks that are quite demanding. For example, I use Ente which does local indexing on the phone for the ML image search (which isn't an "easy" task) and I do run small edge-type ML models (such as whisper, of re-train the transformer model in FUTO)... Now I know probably I could do those things on a 2025 mid-range processor, but I worry that by 2027 I will want to replace the phone because the things I want to do will have rendered the phone obsolete. A faster processor allows me to go for an extra year or two without suffering a painfully slow phone, so I'd also want this before making the switch.

It's okay - according to the type of articles they've been writing themselves, now they can feel more human and have more quality time. https://archive.ph/hYnrE

Billionaire leopards eating workers' faces once again.

This is true but at the current computer prices, nowhere near as bad as it sounds. I spend £100/year or thereabouts for GeForce Now, and

• there's no way I could play games on a £500 laptop that I renew every 5 years,
• no way that a £1000 laptop could get me to play AAA games for more than 1-2 years
• and sure, I could play games on a £2000 laptop, but no way that will last me 20 years.

If you have a life and can't play any more than 25 hours a week, the value proposition right now is great - there's no viable alternative that allows you to keep playing AAA games for the equivalent of £100/year.

It was created as a bit of an art experiment. What happens when AI agents take prompts for another AI agents. What do they "discuss", do they give each other tips and advice, how much weird shit do they do...

From that point of view, it's been rather interesting.

Only if people stay. Ending remote work is a way to lose 20% of the workforce to attrition. An office costs far far less than 20% of the salary mass, and if they were doing any sort of hybrid work, they might even have enough desk space already anyway...

At this point, and given the current state of Proton (👍) and the current state of Windows (👎), the question should be, "Does the new version of Wine run Windows apps better than Windows?"

It is... if it's a screen from 2015.

I keep my phones for 2-3+ years and I haven't managed to get burn-in since the Nexus 6P. I'd say anything newer than a Pixel 3 is free from burn in unless you do something weird (like a demo unit in a store displaying the same image 14 hours a day).

Devs ≠ C-Suite Execs

It might not be sexy, but I'd argue it doesn't need AI to be.

Take the SMEG ones as an example - they're not my cup of tea, but the amount of people who are willing to pay a premium for a fridge that doesn't do anything special other than looking nice shows clearly that.

I think it's ok, the comment literally says "according to Lisuan". Which I see as factually correct - that's the marketing claim, or the performance according to them, just like Teslas have been self-driving according to Tesla since 2012.