LittleBobbyTables

joined 2 years ago
[–] LittleBobbyTables 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You say you've already read Librewolf's FAQ, so I can skip over what they've provided in their response.

The only possible downside I could see would be that your encrypted data is stored on Mozilla servers. Which isn't a very major downside--it's properly end-to-end-encrypted. This is mentioned both by Mozilla themselves, as well as in the Librewolf docs. This is the only downside I can see right now, but for the paranoid, it might be worth looking toward the future; who knows, maybe some day, Firefox will randomly decide to disable E2EE for Firefox sync. That could be a potential downside down the road. But I find that to be pretty unrealistic... I honestly can't see a lot of ways for Mozilla to screw this up.

If the prospect of relying on Mozilla servers still makes you uncomfortable, then you can self-host a sync server, but it's not exactly a quick setup. They do provide a Docker method of installation, at least. The sync server code is found here, along with installation instructions for self-hosting and how to connect it to Firefox/Librewolf/other derivatives: https://github.com/mozilla-services/syncstorage-rs

[–] LittleBobbyTables 2 points 1 month ago

The downside is that Waterfox is based on Firefox ESR (Extended Support Release) builds, rather than the main Firefox branch.

ESR builds are actually less secure than regular Firefox because they receive security updates more slowly.

How accurate is this, exactly? I was under the impression that Firefox ESR is akin to something like the LTS Linux kernel. That is to say, sure, it doesn't receive fancy new features as soon as they release, but surely it still receives important security updates in a timely manner.

[–] LittleBobbyTables 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This has been my go-to API testing tool ever since Insomnia started forcing users to sign up with an email just to use the program. They stripped the fully-offline model from it and effectively ruined the whole application.

Also, side note--the Flatpak for Bruno is listed as proprietary, but the official GitHub repo contains the MIT license, and the official repo references the Flatpak in the README, so that makes me assume it's an official Flatpak. What gives? Does anyone know?

[–] LittleBobbyTables 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  • ALWAYS avoid partial upgrades, lest you end up bricking your system: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/System_maintenance#Partial_upgrades_are_unsupported
  • The Arch Wiki is your best friend. You can also use it offline, take a look at wikiman: https://github.com/filiparag/wikiman
  • It doesn't hurt to have the LTS kernel installed as a backup option (assuming you use the standard kernel as your chosen default) in case you update to a newer kernel version and a driver here or there breaks. It's happened to me on Arch a few times. One of them completely borked my internet connection, the other one would freeze any game I played via WINE/Proton because I didn't have resize BAR enabled in the BIOS. Sometimes switching to the LTS kernel can get around these temporary hiccups, at least until the maintainers fix those issues in the next kernel version.
  • The AUR is not vetted as much as the main package repositories, as it's mostly community-made packages. Don't install AUR packages you don't 100% trust. Always check the PKGBUILD if you're paranoid.
[–] LittleBobbyTables 16 points 2 months ago

This is excellent news. This is one of the biggest features that I've wanted out of Firefox for years, and one of the reasons I've kept Chromium as a secondary browser all this time.

I do remember seeing a community-made GitHub project that added a profile switcher to Firefox, which looked pretty good, but it also required installing an executable somewhere on the system, which I'm not exactly keen on.

I think Zen Browser has a built-in profile switcher, but it also changes a bunch of core UI elements... I just want Firefox with a profile switcher, lol.

[–] LittleBobbyTables 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In regards to email aliasing services, addy.io is the only one I know of other than SimpleLogin, which is owned by Proton AG--so if you want to get away from Proton, SimpleLogin isn't an option. Both of these services are recommended on privacyguides.org.

Some email services allow you to use a domain you own, which theoretically should give you unlimited aliases to work with, but may not be as privacy-focused as the email address is only as anonymous as your registered domain.

Personally, I prefer the 'pseudonymous' aliases that addy.io and Proton Pass give (it's usually something like random.words123@passmail.net in the case of Proton).

If anyone has good experiences with other aliasing services that provide this option, please let us know.

[–] LittleBobbyTables 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can only speak for myself here, but you could give Limo a try. It's Linux-native (so you don't have to run it through Wine, unlike Vortex & Mod Organizer 2), the UI works well enough for my needs, and it has Nexus Mods support (you just give it an API key in the settings, so it can download mods for you). You'll want to read the documentation for it though, to understand what "Data" and "Bin" mean when installing mods, deployment methods, LOOT integration, etc.

[–] LittleBobbyTables 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Agreed, and one particular example I can think of is Terraria's Steam Workshop tools. If I try and publish a texture pack using the Linux-native version of the game, it crashes, but when I use the Windows version of the game via Proton, it works just fine. Not sure if the developers have gotten around to fixing this yet.

Edit: Now that I think of it, it's a similar story with Half-Life 2 now that they added Steam Workshop support for its 20th anniversary. Crashes on native, works fine under Proton.

[–] LittleBobbyTables 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yep, been self-hosting it locally for a while now. To put simply, I archive anything that is within my personal realm of interest that I believe has a chance to be deleted, and is important to keep a copy of. It could be troubleshooting tips for specific tech issues, things that may be under threat of takedown, or maybe just an article I like and want a local copy of. It's a wonderful tool.

[–] LittleBobbyTables 5 points 3 months ago

I get 8.44 bits (1 in 347.34 browsers). I use Firefox with Arkenfox user.js applied on top, with some of my own custom overrides.

However, I think the biggest factor could be because I have Ublock Origin set to medium-hard mode (block 1st party scripts, 3rd party scripts and 3rd party iframes by default on all websites), so the lack of JavaScript heavily affects what non-whitelisted websites can track. I did whitelist 1st-party scripts on the main domain for this test (coveryourtracks.eff.org), but all the 'tracker' site redirects stay off the whitelist.

I actually had to allow Ublock Origin to temporarily visit the tracker sites for the test to properly finish--otherwise it gives me a big warning that I'm about to visit a domain on the filter list.

[–] LittleBobbyTables 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

A friendly reminder to everyone to check out ArchiveBox if you're looking for a self-hosted archiving solution. I've been using it for a while now and it works great; it can be a little rough around the edges at times, but I think it's a wonderful tool. It's allowed me to continue saving pages during the Internet Archive's outage.

[–] LittleBobbyTables 1 points 5 months ago

Sorry for the late response, but yes, I believe you can. There is an option in the config called allow_public_upload which can be changed to true or false.

view more: next ›