Thanks a lot you shit-brained, fuck-faced, ball breaking, duck fucking pain in the ass
LogicalFallacy
The divisions aren't a result of right wing bigotry, but they are exploited by right wing propagandists.
What they actually do is frame all of these arguments without nuance. Then when corporate media goes with that framing you have reductivist talking points that bully out any reasonable debate.
This is a superpower that the GOP has and the DNC cannot replicate with the current level of public discourse.
«Bless me father for I have sinned: I have a sex slave in my basement. I rape him every day because I cannot control myself."
You don't report that and you're siding the continue commission of a crime.
Overall you're right about the first amendment, but it feels like that separating only goes one way, and I'm tired of religion getting the better side of it.
It's also so selective. I can't kill a live chicken to practice Santeria but it's fine for orthodox jews on Kaporos? We can't compel a priest to report a murder or testify but they can tell their constituents to vote for the candidate that bans women's healthcare?
The left doesn’t understand how Joe Rogan got popular in the first place. It’s because he’s authentic
He's an authentic idiot.
The DNC has no authenticity though, you're right there.
"Trans athletes should not compete in competitive sports."
"Palestine is a terrorist state."
"Israel is committing genocide."
These aren't really said by any one right wing taking head, in fact they work better if a "left wing" person says it; think Bill Mahr.
You're literally arguing an unknown.
He's going after autism because he's afraid he has it? I think it's more likely he's a useful idiot and his "data" is picked up by a fascist government consolidating power by villianizing out-groups.
But continue speculating on your own, I guess.
I'm not racist I hate all people equally
He cannot suspend habeas corpus, only congress can. If his brownshirts try to enforce an illegal executive order, any officer that tries is violating their oath to the constitution, making them criminals. Anything you do to resist is therefore legally expressing your rights against criminal activities; lethal force is always justified in a violent kidnapping.
Thanks for telling me to use the middle links
I hate to say it, but this feels oddly familiar . . . with a very unexpected twist.