[-] Melody@lemmy.one 35 points 2 days ago

It's like playing Uno; but with reverse cards only.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So we have:

  • Ad Blockers
  • 'Ad Blocker' blockers
  • ''Ad blocker' blocker' blockers
  • '''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers
  • ''''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers
  • '''''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers' blockers; and finally;
  • ''''''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers' blocker' blockers; with;
  • '''''''Ad Blocker' blocker' blocker' blocker' blockers' blocker' blocker' blockers

in development.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 4 points 3 days ago

I'd even recommend talking about this with her one to one as quickly as is reasonably and respectfully possible. It will be better if she is not allowed to emotionally stew in this revelation to arrive at the mentioned conclusion.

She needs to know it won't go away and it changes literally nothing about the marriage or feelings

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 91 points 3 weeks ago

For the love of god; the media needs to start ignoring the orange idiot.

Report only on his court cases and their outcomes and nothing more. Give this fool no airtime.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 112 points 7 months ago

Uninstall and Delete with extreme prejudice. Find an APK that has this removed or cracked; or make sure your system locale or language do not imply you might be Chinese speaking.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 66 points 7 months ago

Worse:

"I'm aware that you're paying nearly $30 a month for our Ad-Free tier; but this content creator still demands we put Ads on this shit. Here's an Ad!" Crashes and refuses to begin playback again when your browser that's configured to block those ads blocks it.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 88 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's sad that a teacher could possibly have no private life. It's even more questionable how the account was "found". I see no one is mentioned as having found it and reported it.

I think it was foolish of the district to fire her; if no student knew about it. The article also neglects to mention parental outrage; so it would seem that not even a parent discovered this either.

If all of this was done explicitly outside of the school, off grounds, and not mentioned ever; it makes no sense other than a few adults finding it awkward.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 57 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think you'd be foolish not to do so. Make sure that you also abandon any software that collapses to UK legal pressure.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 65 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you care about privacy; you tell your employer clearly that you do not tolerate "Boss-ware" or other spyware on your personal devices.

If they give a shit; they will then be forced to issue one that the company owns and manages. If they don't give a shit; you walk away. Lots of companies will hire you without that crap. Don't believe people who gaslight you by saying "But every company uses it!" or anything sounding remotely like it.

On a company-issued machine; you tell your employer clearly that you do not tolerate "Boss-ware" that will be used to track or manage your time. Walk away; if they refuse to keep your machine clean of it or attempt to raise any concern that you're not at your PC every damned moment of your core hours. You have a right to live your life. As long as your immediate bosses and supervisors are happy with the quality and quantity of the work you submit, you've done your job. If they are unhappy with the quality or quantity of your work then, they can respectfully schedule a meeting with you to discuss it. The way an actual adult should be treated, and, would be treated in an actual office that observes all standard rules of professionalism. With respect.

TL;DR: Do not accept the implementation of Boss-ware as if the decision was made with any professionalism or respect for you. If they implement it; you leave as fast as possible. Take any friends that you can with you too, if you can.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 114 points 10 months ago

This feels like an obvious bullshit cop-out reason to defederate against a specific community that they don't like for whatever silly reason they can't reveal to the public.

Never have I seen an actual link to content survive very long on lemmy.ml or dbzer0.com. Just like the good old /r/Piracy we discuss piracy, but we do not directly facilitate it.

Someone please slap the back of their heads repeatedly and aggressively with these facts. This excuse is disingenuous as hell.

If you are a user of lemmy.world; RUN. NOW! Find a new instance. Switch away from them before they reach terminal enshitification velocity.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 96 points 11 months ago

WEI’s goal is to make the web more private and safe

Bull. Fucking. Shit. You do not get to pick and choose who you treat differently based on software level indications. You absolutely cannot justify this technology with fraud-prevention; as your fraud prevention should be baked in elsewhere in your logic chain and service delivery anyways. Developers do not need yet another magic number. Your typical fraudster is going to be an Authenticated Human anyways; and will easily bypass this attestation if this is actually implemented as intended. Because of that fact; this will drive desperate developers to implement this in consumer-hostile and privacy-hostile manners. You cannot simply say "That's not how it's intended to be used" and expect those devs to play along with it!

TL;DR: We must not give developers tools that can be abused in ways that run counter to the open internet

WEI is not designed to single out browsers or extensions

Wrong!

You absolutely ARE singling out browsers; particularly ones that may be older or "Un-attestable" for other arbitrary reasons. This will impact a large number of people in the disabled community who may use specific, webpage modifying extensions in order to make the web more usable for themselves.

WEI prevents ecosystem lock-in through hold-backs

This won't work; your devs will just write other server backend code that is forked off of yours that won't "hold back". This is a ridiculously tiny band-aid for a gaping wound that needs stitches;

WEI does not disadvantage browsers that spoof their identity

Wrong again! You cannot trust developers and companies with financial motivations and interests to not mark spoofed browsers as fraudulent; nor can you obligate them to treat them exactly the same as a properly attested browser agent.

Let’s work together on finding the right path

This proposal is not working together! This is a blatant attempt by Google and Alphabet to further bully it's dominance over standards for the financial gain of itself and it's partners. Please don't pretend otherwise.

430
submitted 11 months ago by Melody@lemmy.one to c/memes@lemmy.ml
[-] Melody@lemmy.one 92 points 1 year ago

Empress is a neurotic narcissist who needs to be NUKED at every release and HARD MUTED, IGNORED, AND DEPLATFORMED by every sociopathic rant she makes.

We should not be giving her attention by talking about her; she needs to be SHUNNED into OBSCURITY. Let her fucking philosophize in her own damn isolation. Her behavior is unacceptable by most social standards and her contributions to society are not so significant we can't do without them.

9
submitted 1 year ago by Melody@lemmy.one to c/genderqueer@lemmy.one

Memes and comical images are now allowed; but please keep them tasteful, positive and nice. I will still moderate offensive images.

105
reddit be like (lemmy.one)
submitted 1 year ago by Melody@lemmy.one to c/memes@lemmy.ml
48
submitted 1 year ago by Melody@lemmy.one to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.one/post/310151

Unfortunately and predictably /u/CedarWolf and I could not see eye to eye.

He is laser focused on protecting users. I do not see how this was possible on reddit if we lacked the normal 3rd Party Apps we've always used to manage the subreddit.

The subreddit has always been run through a massive set of YAML rules via the AutoModerator. Through these rules I was able to manage the entire subreddit. Alone.

Never did the other two mods really ever engage in any actions or even open dialogue. I had to open the dialogue about the community myself to get a response; and it was typical of your average reddit power moderator. He wanted to bend the knee to reddit. I refused.

Let me be perfectly clear. I accept responsibility for my actions.

However; I did not anticipate the complete lack of support from this top mod for the protest. Going forward I urge users to exercise their best judgement. The /r/genderqueer subreddit that will exist from now on is no longer the same community it was.

I am not going to badmouth CedarWolf. I am only going to present facts. We no longer operate the same community.

Thanks,

formerly /u/Zazie_Lavender (Account on reddit is deleted)

5
submitted 1 year ago by Melody@lemmy.one to c/furry@pawb.social
1
submitted 1 year ago by Melody@lemmy.one to c/genderqueer@lemmy.one

How are all of you wonderful people doing these days? :3

1
submitted 1 year ago by Melody@lemmy.one to c/meta@lemmy.one

What happened? Is there some need for additional assistance or moderation or did something change about the direction of the instance?

Genuinely though; I could understand if it was done defensively; I do see some trolls rolling through here...

1
submitted 1 year ago by Melody@lemmy.one to c/meta@lemmy.one

As the title implies; how did we achieve a "No Downvoting" functionality on this instance; and how does it function with relation to other instances which may not disable the feature?

view more: next ›

Melody

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF