I don't know what you're talking about. The dude said girls dont play dota 2 and claimed it's because they get trolled or harassed or whatever. I said no, they just don't like that game since there is not a single female esport player in that game. Val which you claim is so toxic has female esport players. You don't even address anything I say you just make unsubstantiated claims even contradicting claims. You say female gamers won't want to continue playing games if they encounter someone being mean to them but then you say it seems there are more girls than ever playing. So which one is it?
We already have ways to address someone being toxic to you. It's called the mute and report button. What more do you want? An ai listening to every word you say banning you for even the slightest banter? People will become afraid to even say anything for fear of accidently slighting one of you snowflakes.
I'm just saying there can be a case made in front of a judge about the government funding these companies and then using these companies to reprive people of their 1st amendment rights as they have been proven to have done on X.
But whatever you say... Coal miners.... Unemployment.... Between jobs.... Slavery... Wtf are you talking about?
They sure have received a lot of government/taxpayer money for being such a private anti free speech company.
The fact meta has received 2 billion dollars in taxpayer gov't money should entitle every single taxpayer to their 1st amendment.
Your open mic night hypothetical is not a shadow ban. That's just a normal ban. Which is I think what people are asking for. If these social media companies are going to censor us on the Internet we essentially built via govt subsidies hell we even essentially build these companies by giving straight to them gov't subsidies then fuck yea notify us that we are actively being censored.
That's cool. I've never had those problems at all other than 1 damaged order once which believe it or not you can purchase a damaged product at a store as well. Matter of fact just last week I bought what I thought to be something new inside a store and it was clearly used. I've never experienced that at Amazon but yea anyways sucks to suck doesn't it?
Press x to doubt.
Normally there would be another growing sector to relocate the more overstaffed department but there isn’t.
Knowing Amazon quite well, there definitely are sectors that are seriously deficient even new emerging ones within Amazon seem deficient.
It wasn’t painless, far from it, but the point was that unions couldn’t stop it, not that it was fair or nice.
I agree it wasn't painless in fact there is a high suicide rate within the computer sciences field. In fact it probably still isn't painless. I also agree unions are useless but some government regulation wouldn't be.
That just is.
Yea everything is. Until it isn't.
They'll say the work is not needed. That's because the workload gets pushed to whoever is left. Is there a way you go from 110k employees to 20k and have no workload increase at all without some suffering some deficiencies somewhere in the product. Doubt it.
Another thing is who decides what the employees work on. "Industry hasn't innovated in x years" okay that's on CEO/management they decide what products to invest time in. It seems all that's left are barbarians in these companies. Possibly the visionaries have long been layed off it seems?