Neptr

It's a panel of tests for browsers. It isn't the clearest what each mean (without doing a little research) and not all categories and subcategories have equal importance. I still like this website though just for the listed information.

I recommend Fedora or openSUSE Tumbleweed.

Lol, understandable.

It seems like an interesting setup. I don't really have too much to say other than nitpicks.

Why not use Mullvad browser for both scenarios. Mullvad with security level safest should block all JS. You could create a 2nd profile for safest only mode.

Using Linux .desktop launcher scripts, you could:

• Create a .desktop launcher (in ~/.local/share/applications/) for each profile
• Edit default desktop launcher to always prompt to choice profile on start (using the launch option -P)
• Edit the default launcher to offer a menu option for each profile.

Related to your choice of host OS, I personally avoid Debian for desktop because it is slow to adapt (cus its Debian). I know it isnt directly applicable to situation since your main concern seems to be anti-fingerprinting, but a secure base is important. I'd like to know your reason for picking it. I don't dislike Debian and I still use it for different things (mostly VMs and some dev work).

Thanks for the rant, I liked your write-up.

I think it may also help some people to create simple decision flowcharts to help with acting consistent and avoid making simple mistakes with a complex threat model. Basically a scenario and the decision tree. Say for example someone is using QubesOS and needs to keep consistent what each qube is for and why.

Of course creating charts that show your strategy and make your decision predictable is itself just even more privileged information you now need to protect.

Also, any effective threat model also requires consistent reevaluation to assess the effectiveness of your methods and adjust with the evolution of threats.

Which would that be *pulls out the deathray which terminates fun places on the internet*?

It wont be a problem because from the Live USB you can mount the encrypted drive in the file explorer app (Dolphin on KDE) after supplying the encryption password.

No

Firejail is a large SETUID binary which can (and has) aid in privilege escalation. It is recommended to avoid it for this reason.

See: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/linux.html#firejail

If you are relying on community sandboxing profiles and not making your own, i can understand why Firejail is interesting as a choice because of its large community.

If you are making your own, consider checking out Bubblewrap (available on most Linux systems), Bubblejail), Crablock, and Sydbox, which all use unprivileged sandboxes.

It really isnt any defense. All a website can do is initiate a download, websites are sandboxed by default. You still have to run the executable, which doesnt really apply to Linux because the file will have no executable permission.

This made me immediately think of how old American homes in the back of the mirror cabinet of the bathroom just had a slot that fed into the space between the drywall so you could through your razerblades away. Good luck to the renovators in 50 years when they need to remove that drywall and pick up a thousand rusty butterfly-style razerblades. Can't throw those suckers in a plastic trashbag either cus it'll cut right through.

I actually love that channel lol. A friend showed it to me a while ago and it is performance art (in the jerma985 sense).