I know we are all happy Ukraine taking land like this, having some military success. I don't want to be a downer, but it's also a liability taking land you have no desire to hold. Sure I understand all the benefits of this, absolutely. It's great success. I just hope it translates into frontline changes where it matters more.
For sure it's a blow to putin and his image, but is it substantial or just wishful thinking?
What if hypothetically, it's no problem for Putin? Wouldn't Russia just let them have whatever they took, make a "surovikin line" there and let Ukraine deal with all the issues that come with invasion and dealing with the local population. Not to mention there will at some point come questions from the western partners about this occupation.
What is he met Satan? Christianity, the only religion of Satan. Literally!
What if he met zeus?
I think he should sue the EU customers! It's unfair their political beliefs are hurting his business.
Walz could never go to Iraq cause of hearing issues of his long artillery career. Or so I've heard.
BTW, why does vance always wear the eyeliner. It's creepy.
I don't really know, but when they have weird illogical views that they defend with trump like arguments, I think they are kids. They might not be 10.
I was telling this to my girlfriend at the time when she moved and she was like : tf you taking about?
We broke up.
Its more likely it's the patriot or updated s200.
Tldr: Nobody wants them, because they fear they will bring hamas with them and because they are a political tool against Israel.
Its seriously f*d up.
For me it was the brain dead disgusting coments they make about Ukraine and the war.
NoiseColor
joined 1 year ago
It's good, it's great for Ukraine if they do. If Russia finds resources somewhere else, this could end up being a pointless excursion.