Pudutr0n

For years, there has been a lot of backlash against the “objectification of showers”, which i can totally understand because it’s a “condescending” term that looks at showers like objects, not as actual places of epiphany.

But the same is happening with the concept of “showerthoughts”: If ideas are referred to as “showerthoughts”, that means that they are being reduced to their hygenic circumstances; to their ability to shower.

That is a condescending term. The view should be that showers are good places for thoughts first, and places to wash your junk second. Thoughts deserve showers, and a good wash, not because they’re showerthoughts, but because they come from showers. That is how showers should be looked at.

You might not agree with me, but then again if you don't, maybe you're just working with regex too much.

And for you savages that don't know your temperaments and think knowing about medical terminology that's been obsolete for over 2000 years is useless,

I made a cheat sheet for you.

Have a nice day, and make sure you don't run out of leeches or you just might end up doing css.

pudú

Thank you, thank you. I'll see myself out.