QHC

joined 2 years ago
[–] QHC@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Fermi Paradox is a thought experiment, it's not a physical law of the universe. There are big, essentially made-up assumptions that have to be plugged into the formula to end up with the answer of "there's probably lots of aliens out there". I think we probably both agree on those assumptions being reasonable, but they are not proven. For these reasons, I simply do not agree that it's relevant at all in this discussion.

Keep in mind that we're not talking about the existence of an alien civilization, or even specifically that aliens have visited Earth in modern times. Rather, the big question is about whether aliens are visiting Earth and some humans know about it, but are keeping it a secret. That is the core of what people like Grusch are claiming. To prove this we need both evidence of alien life existing (already a huge claim, one of the biggest questions science has yet to tackle) and evidence of a human conspiracy.

Theoretically this must be happening in other countries, too, right? If not, that means there's only been very limited incidents and not the hundreds to thousands of incidents over decades that UFO apologists claim. Except all of this is also tied into the UAP sightings which we now know are pretty widespread... looking at the full picture, things start to collapse under their own logic.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As a general space nerd you might benefit from entertaining the idea these accounts have veracity without accepting them as true.

Why should I spend any of my time or energy on an unproven claim? Should I also entertain the idea that an invisible pink teapot is orbiting earth until it's proven false? What if there is someone with "credibility" claiming they have (classified) photos of the teapot, is it worth considering then?

[–] QHC@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also, it's worth noting he wasn't the only witness.

My understanding is that Grusch has not actually claimed to have first-hand evidence of anything he claims. He is relying on some other source telling him they've seen crazy shit, essentially.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Sounds the same as believing a random stranger.

How many SO topics have you seen with only one, universally agreed upon solution?

[–] QHC@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

If you want a one stop shop to get all the necessary information in an efficient time then megathreads are great.

Strong disagree. My experience with megathreads is primarily being full of memes and puns, with so many hundreds of root comments that even using extra tools it was impossible to follow any real conversation or updates.

It's also good at stopping a specific type of content from taking over a forum...

That is the only thing megathreads accomplish, IMO.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There is already a system for users to provide feedback on what articles they do or don't want to see.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 122 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I agree with others that the concept of "mega threads" are fundamentally broken and not something I'm interested in carrying over from Reddit.

This is a place for discussion where users vote to decide what rises or stays obscure. Let the system work how it is designed. If there are too many posts about a particular topic, it's either extremely relevant at the time or there are other moderation rules that could be considered to make sure low-effort posts are not dominating more substantial posts.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is it better than a light rail system, or would that not help sell enough products from a company owned by Musk?

[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Sometimes one or the other has a recent updates that causes problems, or a random movie won't play right. It's rare, but since both connect to the same NAS where all of my media is stored, running both is pretty easy and it's nice to have a backup.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? "Innocent until proven guilty" is only relevant from the perspective of the law.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)

How is that practically different from a user perspective than answers on SO? Either way, I still have to try the suggested solutions to see if they work in my particular situation.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I work for a marketing agency which has a mix of typical office roles (accounting, HR, sales) and industry specific positions (mostly creatives and developers). The former are normally used to Windows from previous jobs or school, and the exact opposite is true of the creative departments. So, choosing which platform each new hire prefers is standard for us (and has been for more than a decade).

view more: ‹ prev next ›