"For Peace" for Americans, everyone else can bomb each other to death.
And by 'Americans', he only means those who support him. Those who don't get bombed, too.
"For Peace" for Americans, everyone else can bomb each other to death.
And by 'Americans', he only means those who support him. Those who don't get bombed, too.
An interesting study into how people can rationalise any harmful action as justified when motivated to swallow enough complete bullshit.
I'm an academic working to analyse hate speech, with a particular focus on online misogyny. As bigotry is illogical, common features of communications of that hatred is stuff that is wholly made up. This include the idea that men are being short-changed by a medical industry which prioritise female health. This is factually untrue, in terms of gender differences in health outcomes.
If knowing about the truth makes me a 'sad sack', fine. Maybe being correct and 'sad' is more important than being incorrect yet happy.
And then encourage people with useful degrees to move to states which will cancel the debt.
It’s a good thing we invented this straw person
So, neither misogynists nor anti-vaxxers exist?
I can find you evidence of men complaining about free period products. I am certain there will be men complaining that female cancers are getting cures, and not male ones.
You seem to be having a bad day. Maybe taking it out on strangers will help?
While the reasons for the decline are not immediately clear, researchers and those on the frontlines believe it is driven by changes in the drug supply as well as improved access to treatment and harm reduction programs. [...]
But she also highlighted the continued – and increasingly unequal – death toll from the overdose crisis when it comes to who in society is affected the most.
“It’s also important to acknowledge that progress has not been equal for all groups,” she said. “Unfortunately, for the most affected groups, namely Native Americans and Black American men, the death rates are not decreasing and are at the highest recorded levels.”
Was "Those weak French, amirite?" trolling, or was it making fun of people who falsely call French people 'weak' as a form of nationalistic bigotry?
I read it as the latter. "The French are still weak," would be clear bigotry, the 'amirite?' makes me lean more towards making fun of them.
Of course, we can't definitively say due to the lack of clear tone in written language.
This is great news. Yet, sadly, I am drawn to wondering who will complain about this the loudest. Will it be misogynists who say "they're not helping men with their cancer", or anti-vaxxers saying "this vaccine will actually CAUSE cancer"?
What about people who are both misogynist and anti-vaccine?
Making fake money by burning real hydrocarbons is a loud business, Maureen. So loud I can't hear you complaining over the noise of all this binary industry.
"Conservative activists are being safely removed from society into prison ships that will orbit Neptune until they die of being so angry," would be a pleasant follow-up headline.
And, sadly, sometimes parents refuse the vaccine that would help.