If you see our point, act like it.
No undue disrespect intended in saying this, but you're definitely one to talk, as someone who says their authority regarding mods is sufficient to judge her even though most of your other communities are pro-piracy. And then you went to a post to imply it proves her supposed guilt, and to agree with a proven pan-digital harasser, even though all the harasser's content is now removed because the admins (and not the one Fedilore mod, who is currently being reprimanded), who were also concerned about the one true thing it did mention being too revealing, realized the person that claimed all those claims about the mod was dead wrong. The cherry on top is they were an alt trying to play the role of controlled opposition, as someone discovered) after reading her side of the story relayed by another person, which was only downvoted en masse by your peers out of ableism. The same db0 whose fight against someone who opposed so much as transgender people in sports proved admins would do the opposite if something was actually wrong owes everyone some kind of public denunciation of the slanderer or an apology to the mod in the OP.
This statement kind of confirms that the hate towards things like the mod mentioned by the OP is hated based on populism, not common sense.
Says the one with the minority opinion in the developed world.
They had the very first interracial marriage in fiction back in the 1960's, I think they have the license to be at least a little woke.
With a name like Rage Against The Machine, it's on the tin.
You can always mention religion.
You saying all that context doesn't affect their ability to ignite people into a deceptively charged fury? I can imagine this is frustrating. People just amaze me. They say the biggest signal that something is a cult is that the person in charge has so much charisma that they can say anything (and I mean anything, for example someone could claim "I am not crude matter, I am a human-shaped beam of light") and have people believe them without critical thinking or vetting something for contradictions, like what the leader of the Ant Hill Kids was said to be able to do. And they say the biggest signal that something is a gimmick is that some attribute of something makes people resort to exceptionalism in their critical thinking, as is the case when one person happens upon the best case (though still flawed since it's not true) someone like you must a pedo based on the flawed evidence, and people who normally have standards for how they treat others forgo those entirely and say it's fair game to give you literal hell (think of the pretty patties from Spongebob: "but, but they're colored"... apply that to someone's life and say "I must keeeel them, they're colored like a pedo").
Somewhat makes me wonder if it's accurate to say that, in a world where some people steal trust by exploiting psychology, people not trusting you is actually a sign of your trustworthiness, in the same way as how a billionaire who clearly stole their wealth has a lower worth than someone poor out of their mind. Especially when they're not just exploiting mental weaknesses but attacking people merely for not immediately agreeing and conflating them with their target. I noticed the whole clique is obsessed with misinformation.
There was an episode of The Good Doctor where two of Shaun's patients were teenagers who had a one night stand, and the doctors are arguing over the ethics of it, and Shaun has the last word when he mentioned it's legal in California for consenting teenagers to do it up if they were both teenagers and consented, and he shuts down the debate. This is bold and alarming for a TV show within California, but things get worse outside of California and especially outside the US where people can be more conservative. Some people poke the bear, but they were striking the bear with a frypan here with walking the lines that would get the show banned in places like Korea where the show's predecessor originated in the first place.
My Spanish teacher would teach us Spaniard Spanish and claim it was Mexican Spanish. One day I found out the hard way.
view more: next ›
First of all, she identifies as "she", because that's what she is, a cis asexual woman. Surely you knew signing up that Lemmy doesn't take kindly to transphobia, not even the people in this community.
Second, what she said was apologized for and forgiven years ago. In your inclination towards forming a grudge, what you're implying right now is people cannot change. I see you tried to spin the same claim on the post itself in order to gang up on her. If guilt for a past interaction never expires, we'd be here all day pointing fingers left and right at people because most people who were born before the year 2000 will have memories of not understanding the transgender issue.
Maybe @shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee was right to ban you.