26
submitted 2 days ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/tech@pawb.social
25
submitted 1 week ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/tech@pawb.social
[-] Soatok@pawb.social 0 points 2 weeks ago

Anyone incapable of reading past the title is not worth listening to

[-] Soatok@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

The framing is as follows:

Matrix, OMEMO, whatever.

If it doesn't have all these properties, it's not a Signal competitor. It's disqualified and everyone should shut the fuck up about it when I'm talking about Signal.

That's the entire point of this post. That's the entire framing of this post.

If that's not personally useful, move on to other things.

[-] Soatok@pawb.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

This is a very technology focused view. In any user system, the users themselves have to be a consideration too.

As I wrote here: https://furry.engineer/@soatok/112883040405408545

My whole thing is applied cryptography! When I'm discussing what the bar is to qualify as a real competitor to a private messaging app renowned for its security, I'm ONLY TALKING ABOUT CRYPTOGRAPHIC SECURITY.

This isn't a more broad discussion. This isn't about product or UX decisions, or the Network Effect.

Those are valid discussions to have, but NOT in reply to this specific post, which was very narrowly scoped to outlining the specific minimum technical requirements other products need to have to even deserve a seat at the table.

27
submitted 2 weeks ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/tech@pawb.social
[-] Soatok@pawb.social 0 points 5 months ago

I choose not to make perfect the enemy of good.

[-] Soatok@pawb.social 2 points 5 months ago

If you make the cost of bypassing Nightshade higher than the cost of convincing people to opt in to their data being used in LLM training, then the outcome is obvious. "If you show me the incentives, I'll show you the outcome."

[-] Soatok@pawb.social 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No? That's not what NightShade is. NightShade isn't DRM.

https://nightshade.cs.uchicago.edu/whatis.html

[-] Soatok@pawb.social 6 points 5 months ago

Yep. That's why the two things I say Automattic MUST do to make things right are about proper consent controls for Automattic's use of data and sale to AI vendors, but the third thing is a proposed proactive defense against scrapers.

46
submitted 5 months ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/tech@pawb.social
9
submitted 10 months ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/musicians@pawb.social
18
submitted 10 months ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/tech@pawb.social
[-] Soatok@pawb.social 7 points 10 months ago

That's a personal matter that I don't really feel like commenting on, but I'm not naive about politics and how it affects people.

170
submitted 10 months ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
1
submitted 1 year ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/dholes@pawb.social
[-] Soatok@pawb.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We'll get our top scientists on this, posthaste.

Our bottom and vers scientists remain on standby for new assignments. UwU

[-] Soatok@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Absolutely. I just haven't figured out how to do that yet.

EDIT: Wow, that's a bad UI. https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/314

27
submitted 1 year ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/tech@pawb.social

Hi,

My name is Soatok and I'm a silly sod who didn't realize creating a community would automatically make the the moderator of said community, so I've been asleep at the wheel this whole time due to personal reasons.

Anyway, I'm going to correct this oversight immediately. Sorry for the inconvenience.

7
submitted 1 year ago by Soatok@pawb.social to c/tech@pawb.social

Hi I'm Soatok and I'm a gay furry

Happy Pride Month uwu

view more: next ›

Soatok

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF