Winamp published their code as "open source". Problem is...

1. It wasn't open source, it was proprietary but you can see the source code.
2. Their custom license didn't even allow forks, which is against GitHub TOS
3. The codebase apparently contains proprietary code from third parties that they don't have the right to relicense.
4. The codebase apparently contains GPL code from third parties that they probably didn't have the right to make proprietary in the first place

I don't think it's quite as simple as someone just forking it. Realistically, a browser is an extremely complex piece of software that requires a lot of organizational effort to maintain, deal with security issues, etc. Pretty much every other piece of software on a similar scale I can think of (the kernel, KDE, Blender, Libreoffice) has some sort of organization behind it with at least some amount of officially paid work. All the major forks of Firefox or chromium follow quite closely to upstream for this reason (which is also why I'm skeptical of Brave's ability to maintain manifest v2 long term, despite their probably genuine best efforts to do so).

I do wish that Firefox were developed and funded by an organization specifically dedicated to developing it. This could of course happen if Mozilla dies. But that's going to require someone starting it, which is not at all a small or cheap task.

I could also see a future where Oracle or IBM buys it 😂🤡

This one is already in the default uBlock filters - Badware risks

I also strongly suggest adding https://big.oisd.nl/ as a filter list. It's a large and well maintained domain blocklist (sourced from combining lots of other blocklists) that usually adds lots of these sorts of domains quickly and has very few false positives.

If you want to take it even further, check out the Pro list and Thread Intelligence Feeds list here https://github.com/hagezi/dns-blocklists

These can all be added to a pihole too if you use one.

This is why ublock origin is an essential security tool.

I'm highly skeptical of anti-GMO claims. Usually they come from the same family of pseudoscience as anti-nuclear and anti-vaccine

They have the money and resources to comply with it, but any small competitor won't. So Microsoft will gain even more dominance in the market

Not at all surprised, motherboard firmware from most vendors has always been a steaming pile of shit code, often not even built to spec.

The issue is whether the data is collected by a known third party tracker domain which would be blocked by an adblocker

Friends don't let friends not use ublock origin

Ogg Opus for all lossy audio compression (mp3 needs to die)

7z or tar.zst for general purpose compression (zip and rar need to die)

Any post mentioning Wayland or btrfs is guaranteed to have at least 60 comments

For a company that claims to be desperate to cut costs they sure do have a lot of money for frivolous lawsuits...