See? Bad faith.
TiggerYumYum
joined 3 weeks ago
Based on your bad faith acting. Ya know, the whole conversation up above.
The initial claim was made by a different user. The user you're talking about elaborated on the importance of context, so they didn't contradict themselves.
With reading comprehension like that...
I tagged them as "bad faith actor".
You're hostile to so many people who pointed out the obvious flaws in your logic.
I read your comments.
You're incapable of self-reflection and incapable of admitting you're wrong. Pathetic.
Dystopia is here already. Huzzah...
And Trump doesn't use an auto-Sharpie? Sure.
Sadly this is true. I'm not sure what to do. All my options have failed spectacularly and I'm just one person.
Just stop already. You presented no facts about deputizing. You speculated, wrongly, and were corrected. You even mentioned the monkey paw, which is just nonsensical fantasy. The burden of communication lies on you. If you failed to convey your meaning then that's your fault, not ours.
And we aren't reading your other posts, we are reading here.
The other user elaborated to you on the importance of context. They challenged the definitions of violence. You basically responded "I was right" with very simple ideas. They didn't admit anything later, because their position remained the same throughout. You saying otherwise is the bad faith part. It is okay if you don't understand the complexities, but it is bad faith to misrepresent that other user.