The rise of artificial intelligence and automation is transforming the job market in ways that rival the upheaval of the Industrial Revolution. Many industries are swapping out human workers for machines and algorithms, leaving countless people vulnerable. Jobs that once provided stability and a sense of purpose are disappearing, replaced by profit-driven solutions that prioritize efficiency over human welfare. If we don’t rethink how society is structured to meet this new reality, we risk creating a system even more unequal and exploitative than before.

This is where libertarian socialism comes in. Unlike traditional socialism, which often relies on a centralized state, libertarian socialism emphasizes decentralization, collective ownership, and worker control—without the need for top-down authority. It’s about communities coming together to manage resources and making decisions democratically so everyone’s voice is heard. With AI and automation concentrating wealth and power into the hands of a few tech giants, a decentralized system where people have real influence over how technology is used is essential.

AI and automation are replacing roles far beyond factory workers and cashiers. Truck drivers, data analysts, and even some healthcare professionals are being phased out by machines. This isn’t just an economic problem—it’s a social one. Work isn’t just about earning a paycheck; it’s a core part of our identity and sense of purpose. Libertarian socialism addresses this by advocating for a society where workers have a stake in the companies they work for and a say in how profits are used. If a business chooses to automate, that decision shouldn’t be made solely by CEOs and shareholders—it should involve the workers whose lives are directly impacted.

But it’s not just job loss. AI is also being used to track and control people. Corporations aren’t only automating work—they’re using technology to monitor employees, collecting data to micromanage every second of their day. This strips people of their dignity and autonomy, making them feel like cogs in a machine. Libertarian socialism’s focus on human freedom and self-management directly opposes this trend. It argues for work environments where people have real control and are treated as partners, not resources to be managed and optimized.

Beyond the immediate impact on workers, AI is driving a deeper concentration of wealth and power. When automation replaces workers, the profits from these technologies aren’t shared—they’re funneled to a small group who already own most of the wealth. This accelerates inequality and weakens the foundations of democracy itself. Libertarian socialism rejects this concentration of power and instead advocates for collective ownership, where the people who build and sustain the economy also share in its benefits. Imagine a world where communities decide together how AI should be used and where the wealth it generates benefits everyone, not just the elite.

The question isn’t whether we should embrace AI and automation. It’s about who gets to decide how these technologies are used and who benefits from them. Libertarian socialism offers a vision where technology empowers everyone, where workers have a voice, and where human dignity comes before profits. As we stand on the edge of this new technological era, it’s a framework that can guide us toward a more just and equitable society. If we want a future that values both freedom and fairness, it’s time to consider the principles of libertarian socialism as part of the solution.

This essay discusses libertarian socialism in the light of recent debate in moral and political philosophy. It proposes two principles–affirmed by the pioneers of nineteenth-century libertarianism–and reconstructs them on the basis of arguments that have figured prominently in the vibrant, non-socialist, left-libertarian debate. My purpose is to put forward, and try to defend, a socialist reconciliation between self-ownership and equality that works as an alternative to the left-libertarian reconciliation.

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/25716231

We anarchists are generally averse to cooperating with the police, for very good reasons. However, as I understand it, at times the only real way to protect the community in the society we currently live in seems to be talking with the pigs.

Suppose you believe yourself to have evidence incriminating a serial killer. In an anarchistic society the serial killer could be sent to the psych ward and dealt with humanely. But what about the modern day? Do you turn over the evidence to the police?

This question has been bothering me for about 3 days now. It was provoked by learning about Aufhebengate. It made me wonder under what circumstances snitching is justifiable.