azertyfun

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Right?! A track like Spanish Sahara by Foals that uses the full dynamic range is such a pleasure to listen to. Then there's In the Air Tonight which IIRC has a digital release with super compressed dynamic range. The whole point of that song is that it slowly builds up to a genre-defining drop, so it had better stand out!

But people want to listen to movies on their built-in TV speakers with children crying in the background, and they don't want to understand how or why things are the way they are, they just want to complain that the world doesn't revolve around them.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had a 5.0 setup before I even bought my first TV. I was just using my PC monitor until then.

It's counter-intuitive but decent sound comes first. I'd much rather watch Interstellar in 360p with 5.1 audio than in 4K OLED HDR with built-in speakers.

But when you say that people get mad because they spent a grand on a TV that sounds like shit and they feel they have to defend their choices.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I see that, but that is not what I am saying.

This is just not how things work on a technical level. The default is how cinemas work because that's the experience movies are made for; literally every other way to consume movie audio is "general usage audio programs fine tuning" and that's what needs fixing. That's my entire thesis. By calling me elitist you're just inventing things I'm not saying to get mad over.

Yes 500 € is a lot of money. But I will say I bought a good audio setup years before I even had a TV (some parts second hand so it did not actually cost me that much, and a 3.0 setup gets you 80 % of the way there). It's a markedly better experience to watch a movie on a shitty PC monitor with good audio than on a 55" OLED with built-in speakers, and I will die on that hill. And anecdotally I've heard actual filmmakers say as much.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

OpenID-Connect, the standardized form of oAuth for the sole purpose of authenticating users to third-party services (i.e. google says "yes I certify it is john.smith@gmail.com logging in to your service").

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

99 % of websites even with "2FA" enabled allow to reset all login credentials with an email reset. Or worse, an SMS reset.

aka it's all just 1FA with the password+TOTP just being there for "convenience", and they trust gmail's actual 2FA not to get breached because if it does then the account is donzo.

Not that emailing passwords is good, because users won't change them and are likely to leak them. However login systems that are just an email with temporary credentials are superior to the standard system with the possibility to reset password by email, since they're basically that with less attack surface. The service provider never even has to process the user's password. Literally the only downside is usability, which can be a worthwhile tradeoff.

Alternatively one could do OIDC, but the downside is it only works with whichever authentication providers are setup whereas email registrations work without an intermediary such as google or Microsoft which is a big plus in my book, and might even be a hard requirement in B2B scenarios.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Finished severance s02 this weekend. Very disappointing ending to me (that I will not spoil), even though it seems like it's all anyone could talk about a couple months back.

Maybe it's because I just played Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 and we were spoiled with incredible writing that does foreshadowing excellently with deep and nuanced themes, but while Severance's execution is great in the details the overarching plot left me severely disappointed. As if they got great directors, actors, set designers, dialogue, but just wrote the s01e01 hook and then kind of just made up the plot as an afterthought. Keeping up mystery for its own sake because once the curtain is pulled back, we realize the stage pieces are not that impressive.

It's still good TV but it ain't that deep and IDK why everybody's raving on about it. Anyway thanks for coming to my ted talk.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nowadays "buggy" is not how I'd describe it, though there were certainly teething issues at the beginning. By now other DEs have learned to deal with it.

However it's still true that the GTK4 design is ill-fitting, and very opinionated. Quite exemplary of this are the applications that hardcode the GTK file picker (like Firefox and chrome) even though it's inferior in every way to the Qt file picker and forces the infuriating GTK "design" choice of doing fuzzy search when you type in the file list instead of jumping to the relevant file. Very annoying when dealing with organized directories especially when no other file browser on my system works that way!

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Not books, but the Misfits and Magic TTRPG show from Dimension 20 is everything that HP isn't. It's fun and whimsical and the characters are lovable and the writing is great and the world building is astounding and it never misses a chance to take the piss at the many problematic aspects of HP it's satirically lampooning. I think the first episode is free on YouTube.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

As a European software developer I would love to see that.

Unfortunately I'm afraid those most likely to cry foul aren't Americans, but the majority of European tech businesses who are either reselling MSFT bullshit or completely locked in AWS/Azure/GCP. Open-source/sovereign software services are the exception, not the rule.

view more: ‹ prev next ›