bishbosh

What are the top 3?

Or the more likely case, they know exactly what they are doing and are complicit.

Is alternating case not the standard format for unescaped sarcasm?

Do you say this about the bed rotting folks talk about on tiktok?

Thank you for providing a source. I am not who you were replying too, but this exchange is a funny little microcosm of the conversation.

I doubt many will read the full piece, I doubt many know Roderic Day, and the text shown was fully opinion. There were not detailed citations in the text that would require checking, this wasn't a study, there is basically nothing to the point outside the text itself, except the notoriety of the author, but the knee-jerk reaction seems to be to ask for a source. Would it change their opinion if it was written in the comment itself? Does it make it more legitimate if had been a published book? What level publisher does it require to make the case meaningful? Would it suddenly be a worthwhile point if this was taken from a New York Times op-ed?

To restate the point of the text, to a degree there is no reason to expect them to study the source of the quote, because they wield "Source?" like a club.

I believe it's TMP 2.0 support

Hey that's not fair, they recently added tabs to their file explore. I mean sure it has a shared history, so if you open a new tab and navigate, then return to the previous tab back takes to you their useless 'home screen', but still, there are tabs kinda!

I mean, if you can't talk about killing oligarchs, is it really action??

Well that's the power of federation.

I don't understand what you mean.

Killing someone because of their nationally, race, or job, is wrong.

One of these things is not like the others.

What about this, instead we just take that 1.5 mill a year and put it towards things that actual solve problems, rather than making sure we have the best and brights super soldiers doing traffic stops and taking notes on your break in.