Zeelool has some more left field choices if you're into that. Otherwise I second eyebuydirect
bl4kers
Heh yeah same. Totally
It does. That's what session replay is. Granted it's scoped to the website itself, so no browser or desktop.
Websites do the same thing. Example: openreplay.com
Using a browser is still better because users have more agency. But switching to the web variant isn't a magic bullet on this front.
Worth noting: Android only
Interesting. I think most users would assume they're talking to other adults and might change their language or behavior if they thought they were conversing with children
Age is anything but arbitrary from a law perspective. With these laws there is no expectation of privacy in regards to age. I'd argue there never was, it was just poorly enforced and got normalized
I feel like we need a less invasive form of age verification
Yep. Probably a billion dollar idea if you can execute it properly. These laws are spurring competition
I think most peoples' facial data is already for sale and breachable/leakable
Correct, I don't really want 12-year-olds commenting here either. Do you? Genuine question
Though Lemmy instances are largely public. You don't need an account to view their contents. So that's pretty different from Discord
For the record, I do think the laws will apply to Lemmy instances
That's a false dichotomy. Parents can and should protect children. Social media sites can and should protect children. It's in the social interest. Parents don't have control over every device a child has access to. Firewalls at schools and libraries are often lackluster
I have kids too. I'm not singling out Discord here, just pointing out they're trying to follow the law.
Young kids and social media are inherently a bad mix. Primarily because it promotes antisocial behaviors and they cannot effectively comprehend and consent to the privacy polices and TOS. Hence why adults need to be involved in account creation.
I have "Lemmy" tattooed across my elbow