bl4kers

joined 2 years ago
[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I have "Lemmy" tattooed across my elbow

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Zeelool has some more left field choices if you're into that. Otherwise I second eyebuydirect

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Heh yeah same. Totally

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

It does. That's what session replay is. Granted it's scoped to the website itself, so no browser or desktop.

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Websites do the same thing. Example: openreplay.com

Using a browser is still better because users have more agency. But switching to the web variant isn't a magic bullet on this front.

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

Worth noting: Android only

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Interesting. I think most users would assume they're talking to other adults and might change their language or behavior if they thought they were conversing with children

Age is anything but arbitrary from a law perspective. With these laws there is no expectation of privacy in regards to age. I'd argue there never was, it was just poorly enforced and got normalized

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I feel like we need a less invasive form of age verification

Yep. Probably a billion dollar idea if you can execute it properly. These laws are spurring competition

I think most peoples' facial data is already for sale and breachable/leakable

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Correct, I don't really want 12-year-olds commenting here either. Do you? Genuine question

Though Lemmy instances are largely public. You don't need an account to view their contents. So that's pretty different from Discord

For the record, I do think the laws will apply to Lemmy instances

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a false dichotomy. Parents can and should protect children. Social media sites can and should protect children. It's in the social interest. Parents don't have control over every device a child has access to. Firewalls at schools and libraries are often lackluster

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I have kids too. I'm not singling out Discord here, just pointing out they're trying to follow the law.

Young kids and social media are inherently a bad mix. Primarily because it promotes antisocial behaviors and they cannot effectively comprehend and consent to the privacy polices and TOS. Hence why adults need to be involved in account creation.

view more: ‹ prev next ›