Considering that leaks have come from militaries around the world that aren't allies, that seems pretty tinfoil hat.
it's that at any point a decision can be made which you have no control over
This is true for any software you didn't write. Plenty of FOSS software has gone in directions I didn't like.
The only real difference is whether decision makers have a profit motive. That's important, but that said, it's not everything.
Stay intellectually humble. It's a huge component of wisdom in my observation. Understand you can always make mistakes that can be corrected, and that you have arrived at your opinions through limited information that can always be supplemented, so stay open to both of these possibilities.
You can be confident in your opinions that you arrived upon through spending a lot of effort thinking about them, and you don't need to have self doubt when challenged on them baselessly. But when someone does point out an error or something you missed, it's essential you haven't become closed to accepting it.
Always remember what the basis are for your opinions and how well-founded they really are. For example: how much do you actually know about a thing when you're relying on something you read in the news? How much do they really know about that thing?
As a check on yourself believing you've put a lot of effort into thinking about something, be on the guard for unwarranted confidence. If a professional has put their efforts into something in their field of expertise they've spent their whole lives working on, chances are you haven't thought of something they haven't in the first five minutes of hearing about their work. That might seem ridiculous, but you see this all the time on Lemmy, where for example commenters seem to think they've figured out key errors in scientific papers after reading a single popular science article about an experiment or figured out solutions to incredibly complex problems like fair taxation.
Good article, but it doesn't support your thesis that the sanctions are about China hacking at all. The idea they've managed to achieve this through hacking to steal technology is completely non-existent in the article.
How are they managing to do this? Surely it requires a permission in Android to access the list of installed apps, right?
This is an astonishingly well written, nuanced, and level headed response. Really on a level I'm not used to seeing on this platform.
I don't think waving away being a Luddite just by saying so makes it so.
I can't think of a single angle of principled moral theory that makes this okay. Vandalizing or stealing someone else's property they paid for. Hurting both the restaurant and the customer by depriving them of their food. Holding back progress on an invention that can reduce the need for humans to engage in a type of work that is hard, dangerous at times, and low paid.
From a purely rational on paper view, it doesn't look terribly different than saying vandalizing or stealing from delivery vehicles driven by people isn't wrong. What possible justification could there be for this view besides Ludditism fuck robots?
Unsolicited notification spam ads is in pretty poor taste for a major brand. Doesn't seem wrong to me to infer their sales department is getting desperate if they're resorting to that.
I used to do this. I thought it was awesome but I was literally the only person I ever knew who did this. It was not a popular thing to do.
Games haven't been truly good for a long time
Meanwhile, here I am loving gaming and thinking we're in a golden age of gaming compared to my youth...
Took me a while to figure out how to sign in with my lemdro.id account.
Maybe it's embarrassing to admit but I must have scanned through that long list of servers five times before realizing I could just type in my own server. Could be helpful to add a line inviting users to type in their own server.
My life seems a great deal more boring and uneventful than most people around these parts.