ciferecaNinjo

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

For example:

Via freepost (without stamp)

Défenseur des droits
Free answer 71120
75342 Paris CEDEX 07 

I have only ever seen postage-free envelopes whereby the position where postage normally appears states that no postage is necessary. Without some kind of pre-printed envelope, does the French post office check all destination addresses on envelopes missing postage to see if they qualify?

 

This is a problem in Belgium for sure. I think Netherlands (at least in parts) tend to bury their cables under the sidewalk. Any examples of gracefullly hiding the cables in cities which are hostile toward making telecoms dig up the sidewalk?

 

Crossposted to !exclusive_public_resources.

The French federal website www.economie.gouv.fr should be public access. But they allow US tech giant Cloudflare to restrict access and then snoop on people who manage to get access.

The most recent cached version on archive.org is also useless because archive.org was also presented with Cloudflare’s blockade.

The only openly accessible content is old versions of archive.org snapshots, from the time before CF became archive-hostile.

 

The French federal website www.economie.gouv.fr should be public access. But they allow US tech giant Cloudflare to restrict access and then snoop on people who manage to get access.

The most recent cached version on archive.org is also useless because archive.org was also presented with Cloudflare’s blockade.

The only openly accessible content is old versions of archive.org snapshots, from the time before CF became archive-hostile.

 

Crossposted from https://europe.pub/post/9269750

A utility bill came on paper using:

  • black text (on a variety of different backgrounds- white, orange, gray..)
  • white text (on a variety of different backgrounds- blue, green..)
  • very light grey text (on a variety of different backgrounds- white, intermittent light green imagery..)
  • blue text (on a variety of different backgrounds- white, intermittent light green imagery..)
  • 2 kinds of bold text (extra heavy black and dark green)

I’m not blind. I can see it just fine. But when I try to scan this thing into a bi-level doc, it’s impossible because of this shit-show of color combinations. There is no possible level by which all the text can be made clear. As soon as a level is used to eliminate the colored backgrounds, a lot of the light gray text goes white. This forces me to scan it as color, which wastes file space.

So I thought-- what about blind people? Aren’t they fucked in this situation? If I were blind, I would scan, OCR, then use a screen reader on the text. Some OCR tools can work on color docs but I don’t think all OCR software has that.

Reaching the accessibility law is itself a shitshow in the EU now that the EU blocks Tor. Indeed, only clearnet users are permitted to be aware of the law. I had to pull directive 2019/882 from the archives, where the most recent capture was bad but an old capture was fetchable.

Directive 2019/882 seems to only address “products and services”, and documentation for that commercial category. I see nothing about paper bills. That seems bizarre, no?

I found this Color Contrast for PDF Accessibility: Why Does It Matter?, but that’s not exactly relevant.

So is the utility company legally compliant with this shitty unscannable invoice design?

 

A utility bill came on paper using:

  • black text (on a variety of different backgrounds- white, orange, gray..)
  • white text (on a variety of different backgrounds- blue, green..)
  • very light grey text (on a variety of different backgrounds- white, intermittent light green imagery..)
  • blue text (on a variety of different backgrounds- white, intermittent light green imagery..)
  • 2 kinds of bold text (extra heavy black and dark green)

I’m not blind. I can see it just fine. But when I try to scan this thing into a bi-level doc, it’s impossible because of this shit-show of color combinations. There is no possible level by which all the text can be made clear. As soon as a level is used to eliminate the colored backgrounds, a lot of the light gray text goes white. This forces me to scan it as color, which wastes file space.

So I thought-- what about blind people? Aren’t they fucked in this situation? If I were blind, I would scan, OCR, then use a screen reader on the text. Some OCR tools can work on color docs but I don’t think all OCR software has that.

Reaching the accessibility law is itself a shitshow in the EU now that the EU blocks Tor. Indeed, only clearnet users are permitted to be aware of the law. I had to pull directive 2019/882 from the archives, where the most recent capture was bad but an old capture was fetchable.

Directive 2019/882 seems to only address “products and services”, and documentation for that commercial category. I see nothing about paper bills. That seems bizarre, no?

I found this Color Contrast for PDF Accessibility: Why Does It Matter?, but that’s not exactly relevant.

So is the utility company legally compliant with this shitty unscannable invoice design?

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 6 days ago

thanks but it does not solve my problem. My internet is capped so i can’t do streaming.

 

I have tried two TVs with 3 different tuners and 2 different antennas, in Brussels. One is an old pocket device with DVB-T. The tuner for the other TV (made in 2022) has these specs:

Tuner/Reception/Transmission
• Aerial Input: 75 ohm coaxial (IEC75)
• TV system: PAL I, PAL B/G, PAL D/K, SECAM B/G, SECAM D/K, SECAM L/L
• Video Playback: NTSC, SECAM, PAL
• Tuner bands: Hyperband, S-Channel, UHF, VHF
• Number of Preset Channels: 100
• Tuner Display: PLL

I’m surprised this TV is only a few years old yet there is no mention of DVB-T/2. A powered DVB-T2 antenna is connected to it. Neither finds any signals when autotuning. Is that expected? Wikipedia mentions a long list of stations for Belgium and some seem to be Brussels based.

Can anyone confirm or deny terrestrial TV broadcasts in Brussels or anywhere in the rest of Belgium?

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not sure that’s a sufficient explanation. So I will elaborate for the OP:

Some designs are called a “wet floor”, which means the whole bathroom floor is sloped toward a drain even outside the shower and beyond the showerpan. It’s seems to be a design in cheaper establishments, like cheap hostels. It works but it can be annoying when the floor is still wet when later entering the bathroom in socks or something.

Some designs are more luxury, and have a really big shower pan. A big area is sloped within the shower as an elegant “curbless” design which is great for elderly and handicapped people who might struggle to step over a shower curb. The shower pan is big enough that if the drain is slow or clogged, a fair amount of water can build up without overspilling into the rest of the bathroom.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m not sure what you want a source for. You mean a vendor who will sell one? XO-4 Touch was apparently the last model. I just had a look at laptop.org and the site looks useless now. It used to be full of wikis with copious details about the hardware and software of the OLPC.

There are (or were) a variety of NGOs who worked on getting OLPCs into impoverished schools. One of them was https://unleashkids.org/. They are not in the business of selling them but ~15 yrs ago they were kind enough to sell some. The idea was that teachers and developers would need them to help support the OLPC project. I suggest touching base with them and see what they say, since they seem to still be around.

The XO-4 Touch came with “Sugar”, a foss OS just for kids. It was easy to make it boot into Gnome instead (underpinned by RedHat). And someone made an Android OS that could be flashed onto an SD card and booted in the OLPC. I should mention that the OLPC was never 100% FOSS. The usual shit-show of blobs for some of the hardware drivers. I mainly just used it as an e-reader on Gnome.

I’ve always been baffled that these FOSS e-ink laptops did not make it onto the general marketplace, while at the same time there were no commercial makers of anything like it. There was a “Pixel QI” dual-mode screen that could be bought bare and installed in Thinkpads and other machines, but for some reason that never took off either.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

OLPC (one-laptop-per-child) is a FOSS e-ink laptop (but small enough to function as an e-reader). Though I think they are no longer made and they were always hard to get.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

Here is a way to use open data law to take individual action:

https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/48016373

 

I have some expiring money trapped on a GSM phone. Use-it-or-lose-it. I cannot see how to spend it all at the last minute.

Anyone know of any clever ways to use phone credit?

I think there would be no problem if this were Africa because a lot of people there have no bank account; they use their GSM phones for banking instead.

Update: I found a business that sells the “Premium SMS” service to other companies who want to accept payment in that way:

https://www.cellcom.eu/en/sms-services/11/premium-sms/

But sadly, there is no list of their customers.

So far, I have only found De Lijn, parking, and shitty US tech giants (e.g. Google Play Store) who can take payments via premium SMS.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

From the PDF, one of the EU’s concerns is:

However, much of the value generated by open-source projects is exploited outside the EU, often benefiting tech giants.

When tech giants use FOSS, it’s a shame they can extract wealth without compensating the contributors. OTOH, if the baddies become dependent on FOSS, that’s favorable anyway. It means they might contribute code to the projects which otherwise would not happen.

The PDF does not cover public schools specifically. They need to be told that public schools are the most important place to deploy FOSS. Consider a university in Denmark pushes commercial software on students (sadly, they provide that software on a campus webpage improperly titled “Free Software” b/c it is gratis for students). The damage is of course that Denmark educates people to be dependent or clung-onto closed-source software like MATLAB, not GNU Octave. That negative training means the young generations are being conditioned to favor non-free software.

FSFE does not know about this?

The FSFE has a newsletter for “public money → public code”. They have not mentioned this /have your say/ page. Strange.

Downvotes?

I get why the OP was downvoted here.. this is a bit off-topic for BuyFromEU. But !ETS@europe.pub has 4 silent down votes. WTF? I’ve seen that before. ETS seems to be heavily read by opponents of ETS.

 

I have tried two TVs with 3 different tuners and 2 different antennas, in Brussels. One is an old pocket device with DVB-T. The tuner for the other TV (made in 2022) has these specs:

Tuner/Reception/Transmission
• Aerial Input: 75 ohm coaxial (IEC75)
• TV system: PAL I, PAL B/G, PAL D/K, SECAM B/G, SECAM D/K, SECAM L/L
• Video Playback: NTSC, SECAM, PAL
• Tuner bands: Hyperband, S-Channel, UHF, VHF
• Number of Preset Channels: 100
• Tuner Display: PLL

I’m surprised this TV is only a few years old yet there is no mention of DVB-T/2. A powered DVB-T2 antenna is connected to it. Neither finds any signals when autotuning. Is that expected? Wikipedia mentions a long list of stations for Belgium and some seem to be Brussels based.

Can anyone confirm or deny terrestrial TV broadcasts in Brussels or anywhere in the rest of Belgium?

 

Anyone know of any ways to spend GSM credit, obviously apart from calls, data, & text?

Here is my list:

  1. De Lijn - you can send an SMS to De Lijn to order a single ticket. You get back a code that you show to the driver as you board.

That’s it. My whole list.

I have credit that will expire soon, so I am in a use-it-or-lose it situation and I don’t need a bus ride.

 

It would be useful if all radio topics could be hosted and discussed on a dedicated fedi instance. The lemmy.radio description is constrained to amateur radio:

“A lemmy instance for amateur radio enthusiasts and communities.”

There are no communities anywhere in the fedi for FM or AM radio apart from !radio on LW (a Cloudflare-centralised instance). And that community is strangely constrained (tech support/user inquiries unwelcome according to the sidebar). DAB radio has one community strangely placed on a “UK centric” instance: !dabradio@feddit.uk.

 

(crossposted from !exclusive_public_resources)

Musk’s changes to Twitter:

  • must register as a member to get read access to content
  • members no longer see a non-biased chronological linear timeline; an opaque algorithm decides what to prioritise on the timelines, subject to Elon’s hard-right manipulation

It’s perhaps fair enough that boot-licking pawns decide to subject themselves to quasi-brainwashing manipulation. But when GOVERNMENTS use Twitter, people with a legitimate interest in gov communication are forced to register on an exclusive walled garden where they will come under influence of the extreme right (and thus climate denial among other garbage; hence the crosspost to !climate_action_individual).

How to fix this using open data laws:

Public content published on Twitter legally must be openly accessible to all people. Perhaps not by default but certainly by request. This means individuals can submit an open data request to gov agencies who use Twitter, requesting a copy of all content they publish on Twitter. The gov legally must satisfy the request. All tweets must be in an open machine-readable format (csv, json, or xml).

The dataset is “dynamic”, so I believe future updates must be added to the open data. But what I’ve seen in practice is the gov is not diligent about pushing the updates. They may need to be nagged. If they are nagged enough, perhaps they will decide Twitter is not worth it.

BTW, all of this applies to Facebook as well, noting that Cambridge Analytica is why Trump took power in 2016.

Why this is in degoogle

European govs are using Youtube and thus force people into that access restricted walled garden. You need not register but you can only get access if you reveal your IP address to Google by not using Tor.

The same strategy of open data requests can perhaps be adapted to Google. Request that the gov agency put their videos in peertube or their own website.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

That link gives me:

Our system thinks you might be a robot!

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The petitions are again something else.

I was indeed alienated by the mention of petitions because in English it usually means asking lawmakers to change policy. I wondered if it meant something different in Germany. And if it means the same thing, it’s apparently wrong for the EU to list that agency as an ombudsman.

I am normally happy to use courts. But I don’t live in Germany, don’t speak German, and financing a lawyer would be a non-starter. I suppose I could try to find a German NGO who would support my case.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Yeah I’m not surprised there are subject matter-specific ombuds offices. I was hoping for one at the top of the tree for when those fail. I just found this page where the EU lists them for each member state:

https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/european-network-of-ombudsmen/members/all-members

And for Germany, this office is given:

https://epetitionen.bundestag.de/epet/peteinreichen.html

The complexity in the description on the EU’s page indeed gives cause for concern.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago

Nonsense. This is like comparing the price of rice in China to potatoes in Ireland. Process serving is a legal process with liability. Process serving does not allow for dropping a slip in a box and waiting for the served to come to your office and stand in line at the convenience of the process server. Process servers must be resilient to track down a human, who may rarely be home. There is no lax rule of just waiting 2 weeks for the served person to appear and sending it back.

(edit) A registered letter can also be refused. Which amounts to a simple tickbox and returned letter.

BTW, this is not to say process serving is not also overpriced. But process serving /should/ cost much more than registered letter.

(edit 2) Process serving can turn into a man hunt. I’ve seen process servers dig around like private investigators to find out where someone hangs out, in order to track them down and get papers in front of them. And when it all fails, a process server has to publish the circumstance in a local newspaper to then be able to argue in court that the served had an opportunity to become informed that way.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Email delivery has never been designed to be reliable.

Indeed, not inherently. Though it /can/ be reliable only if sent a certain way. Sender emails a “digital notary” service and puts the ultimate destination in a separate header. The digital notary forwards the msg, timestamps it, signs it, and includes the sig of the previously sent transmission (to create a verfiable chain). A service called the UK Timestamper demonstrates this. It proves posting but not reception. There is a RFC (documented open standard) for read receipts whereby the recipient sends a signal when they open the msg. Of course it’s voluntary and relies on a willing recipient.

In the end, Belgium simply declares that a simple email serves as a registered letter.

Your situation, of course, is one you have created entirely by your choice and typically email delivery is very reliable - but the technological underpinnings absolutely are not.

My situation proves how catastrophic it is to presume reliability. I conciously traded off reliability in exchange for privacy (of a certain kind), control, and malice detection. Though I have no way of knowing how much reliability I am trading. Blackholing is borne out of incompetent design. Delivery cannot be guaranteed but a delivery failure should be signaled to one party or the other.

€10 for a registered mail is not extortionate. It is a reasonable price for the service, which also serves the necessary low barrier that prevents abuse.

It’s absurdly extortionate. It first requires prior class. Prior class within Belgium is more than sending prior from Germany to anywhere in the EU. Then they are charging an additional ~€7 just to collect a sig. The postal workers are quick to insert a slip into the mailbox that forces the recipient to go to the post office and wait in line. It’s very streamlined and convenient (for them, not us). In some cases they don’t even bother buzz the doorbell.. just drop off the slip with the rest of the mail.

If DIGI comes around to drill into your façade to add another cable, you then have a legal obligation to send DIGI a registered letter every time you renovate your facade in the area of the cables. If you have 8 cables attached to your house, that’s a cost of ~€80.

There is an easy opportunity here for a company like Deliveroo to expand and undercut them.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

The ministry of privacy website uses Sucuri to block Tor. So they have a hypocrisy problem. But I’ll have a look anyway. Just because the web admin isn’t on par with their mission doesn’t mean they aren´t useful.

view more: next ›