Since posting, I've actually re-evaluated. With the benefit of hindsight, I think it'll be lucky if it's three stars.

I dunno, I think it will end brilliantly.

To add one thought that others haven't mentioned, inattentiveness to the early warning signs of volatility in the moods of others can often leave us suddenly surprised when others express emotions such as anger or frustration or irritation.

For me at least -- and I have friends who say the same -- this often leads to codependent people-pleasing behaviour because these emotions and situations catch us off guard and can make us fearful of finding ourselves in such a position. As a result, we might develop a maladaptive pattern of pre-emptive management of the feelings of the people around us, where instead we might just learn to accept being uncomfortable, or develop boundaries around the culpability we accept for the circumstances leading to others' moods. In friends who have had abusive or unsafe childhoods, the maladaptive pattern seems especially pronounced because it's an important part of survival.

What this looked like for me before a butt-ton of therapy is that I felt stressed when anyone around me started to express any negative emotion, but even before then, I was orienting my behaviour to give attention to the more volatile people in my life as a top priority. My task selection wasn't really focused on achieving my goals most times, but on doing things that others wanted--or things I perceived others wanted or needed--in order to make sure their days went well and any potential bad emotion dissipated before it got very strong.

For instance, if my (perfectly loving and kind, but 'normal range of human emotions'-having) wife had a bad day at work, I might come home, make them their favourite meal, make up their bed, and then watch a show with them until they fell asleep.

And on the surface, sounds nice! Sounds like caring! But it's done primarily out of fear, not out of caring. There is caring in there, no doubt in my mind, but it's not the first motivator.

And I've seen this pattern play out in me in different contexts and in different ways... with my wife, with my kids, my parents, and in the community; in hovering, fawning, in leaping to 'be useful'...

I think over time, this sort of behaviour leads to an external focus that does make you feel like your job is to help everyone. Throw in a soupçon of impulsivity and then you're telling strangers in the grocery store that the bouillon cubes they're looking at are on sale at the store across the street.

Therapy's helped. It's such an ingrained pattern for me that I fall back to it and it'll be my life's work to remember that I'd rather act out of true love and kindness rather than fear of discomfort.

Absolutely. Capitalism categorizes all people as 'useful' and 'useless', the former really being 'exploitably productive'.

Lots of folks with tons to offer the world are shunted off to the side because what they can offer isn't valued by capital. Either that, or their challenges are perceived as too substantial for the accumulationists to bother to see what accommodations could be made.

But why bother when humans-go-in-money-comes-out is the depth of all thinking and concern? It's not the company's job to care that people are starving three houses over! Why don't they just get a job—

Thank god I just skimmed.

jealously weeps in ruby

Heck yeah.

Right?! I can get my fruit and veg locally, but there should be no problem getting canned food, dried staples, and shelf-stable goods delivered.

I think the only thing stopping it is political will. I haven't heard anyone else even calling for it.

"Oh no, I'm one acquisition short of a monopsony, so you should all blame suppliers instead of me! I definitely have no influence over the cost of input!"

I want a public option. Make basic essentials purchasable online from a warehouse near you and then expand the existing Canada Post distribution network to bring me my damn rice and beans.

Yes

Can I ask if you have any tips for this? Before this, I hadn't heard anything from anyone with a similar problem like ours. My goodest boy is a 9 month old Portuguese Water Dog and he recently decided that the floor boards and every single one of my daughters' Barbies weren't enough to destroy and began removing the carpet for us.

He's so smart and seems to be very empathetic when he's not in destruction mode, but the constant destruction of things is putting a knot in what is an otherwise beautiful relationship right now. We've trained leave-it and settle down, but he'll still grab things and if he's left alone in his safe room he'll find ways to make it unsafe.

It's not immediately apparent in the interface like it might have been in other communities using third-party software. (It would be really nice to access the feature using the kebab menu on the home page listing page, e.g. this: .)

But at least on sh.itjust.works, you can access the feature through the Settings link:

... buried under your username menu, and then by clicking the 'Blocked' tab.

I hope that's helpful to someone else like me who wanted this feature too and didn't realize it existed!

EDIT: It's also actually a lot easier to find if you click into the community; there's a big ol' 'Block community' button: