dudeami0

This assumes a pin is used, which according to the WebAuthn wikipedia page is not generally the case:

The illustrated flow relies on PIN-based user verification, which, in terms of usability, is only a modest improvement over ordinary password authentication. In practice, the use of biometrics for user verification can improve the usability of WebAuthn.

The way I read this, a pin is even too much for the end-user and biometrics replace it for usability.

Can someone explain to me how using biometrics rather than a password/pin to protect from unauthorized access to your passkeys doesn't violate the "something you have" and "something you know" principle of multi-factor authorization? Most of these implementations seem squarely geared at user convenience at the cost of actual security.

I would say this is a little too pessimistic. Legislation in the EU and California have both forced tech companies hands, it's why we can download all our data and delete all our data (supposedly, doubtful in reality) on the large tech platforms. The issue I see is getting legislation that attaches itself to a standard controlled by the W3C. You are right that it won't be something done by the US federal government though.

It's a problem for anyone entering politics. It takes incredible resolve and character to resist selling out. He just didn't have what it takes.

Why not just reply "Oh we have milk!". Why is deleting messages the best course of action when you can just communicate that you were misinformed?

Agreed, and you know they have a record of these deleted texts internally for their own reasons.

Drinking just lowers inhibition so you say what is on your mind. While the results of such might not be desirable, it is what you thought in that moment.

I still drinking and I don't like this feature, ya said what ya said. Also anyone who cares keeps records.

Tragic, the line didn't just go up because one investment was really good.

Nothing, amazon is a leech. Don't use amazon.

I'm just replying to the "quality and cost" part of your post, which are inherently paired. Yes some products just don't exist being made in the US, but if the store has a product that costs twice as much made domestically sitting next to a foreign product of the same or close enough quality, the price alone will dictate which they choose. This is often why domestically made versions of products aren't available without a special order (which is even more expensive) and where tariffs are supposed to be used.

Hard to match cost when labor rights such as minimum wage exist, maybe Trump and Elon will get rid of those too though.