[-] enfa@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago
[-] enfa@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[-] enfa@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Nothing to apologize for - the conversation happened in a different magazine. I'm confident there are other places where the idea has been discussed before that one, too. all good, friend /u/cloudless!

[-] enfa@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

/u/gus is right - 'kbeaner' contains a loaded slur: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaner one thats been around for a long time. It is not one I was aware of until recently.

[-] enfa@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

nova's the new fetch.

1
submitted 1 year ago by enfa@kbin.social to c/kbinMeta@kbin.social

In Mastodon, we have the Covenant, which starts with:

"Active moderation against racism, sexism, homophobia and transphobia
Users must have the confidence that they are joining a safe space, free from white supremacy, anti-semitism and transphobia of other platforms."

I have not seen proposals yet for a similar baseline of rules for Kbin servers, generally. Have I missed one?

Spammers are already here, and I assume nazis and CP types will become known soon unless there is a broad moderation/anti-harassment consensus explicitly stated. I do not know where the kbin.social server is physically located, and which laws govern the content herein.

I think the server owner gets final say in all matters, but that the community here needs to drive this effort so that ernest can focus on the overall development roadmap.

How might we, as a community, come up with a code of conduct that builds a foundation to stave off rot for as long as possible?

1
submitted 1 year ago by enfa@kbin.social to c/reddit@kbin.social

enfa

joined 1 year ago