[-] esscew@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 months ago

As an atheist, I'd say you live in a bubble.

[-] esscew@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

A vast majority of photos are already staged and have been for a very long time, before phone cameras were a decent replacement. In th cases where accuracy is required phone cameras are rarely used. I don't see an issue here.

[-] esscew@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago

Yes, unfortunately. There is a lot of tooling around it but it still feels bizarre after years of using it.

[-] esscew@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hell yea. Can't forget those compile times and that parallelism handling. I can't think of a language that has a better dev cycle to performance ratio.

[-] esscew@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I love Go precisely because of its simplicity which also makes it highly consistent across different codebases. That said I do like the new direction of adding some features devs are clamoring for with helper functions and memory arenas.

Forgot to mention that compile time....hnngg.

[-] esscew@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Somehow it's always the lead software in a category that becomes shitty while everything else is praised. Regardless of what's being talked about. (I know why)

[-] esscew@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

why? You can codegen from rs to ts for types. I fully understand wanting to learn Rust or test frameworks. It's a great language, but it feels like a huge risk to bet on an unproven framework (and currently proven to be slower WASM) as the future of front-end, especially when there are existing frameworks that would garner more support and expertise on the front-end.

esscew

joined 1 year ago