Curiously, most ended up preferring a less readable XMR ID, leaving many common and given names available.
Maybe this is because nowadays we tend to assume the good ones online to be taken - so it's actually a great idea that you point that out! Let's see how it affects the trend.
It's from monero.graphics. It could use an extra dot, I agree :)
The theme resonated - especially in the context of OpenAliases - as I consider more personal and memorable Monero destinations an important factor in the context of building parallel economies, human to human, thus making Monero "greater" through use.
When one opens a camera application (like millipixels), the screen should show what the camera points at and capturing color photo and video of that content should be possible. It should run in a stable manner (meaning no anticipated crashes) and the required changes should be accepted into the postmarketOS edge branch.
As for devices, please refer to the linked wiki-page. It names one Shift device and one OnePlus device (and a variant of it). If only one device were to be chosen, it should be Shift.
I understand your concern about cost - maybe the company could be bothered to sponsor a device for this development.
According to my recent test, the premium was 4.7 percent compared to spot rates, hence their pricing is not competitive and Bitrefill remains without a serious contestant. There you'd only pay the ~0.5% fee for going through an instant exchange in order to have your XMR arrive as BTC.
EDIT: Now, a day later, I did another test and got percentages from 1.8 - 2.0 % which is much more reasonable.
Hint: To quickly get the hidden fees of any purchase, execute units like this:
./units.sh '<xmr-cost-at-checkout> XMR' '<EUR|USD|...>'or./units.sh '<xmr-cost-at-checkout> XMR / <value-in-fiat> <EUR|USD|...>' '%'for the total percentage asked.