At-will employment makes no sense to me. You go to work every day knowing you could be fired without any possibility of taking the time to find another job. It would drive me crazy.
I thank Musk every day for reminding me that money brings neither happiness nor intelligence. He should buy a psychiatrist as soon as possible.
After mods, bans, and shadow bans, we have shadow mods. We should have expected it.
verbal consent
That’s a big mistake. He got $12k for free and will find people who will pay a higher rent.
I've never experienced any slowness with Firefox, so I don't know what people are talking about. But Chrome is still the default browser on Android and I guess it's the major reason why people are installing Chrome on their computer.
The first step is "Fuck the government!" The second step is always "Help me, Obi Wan Government, you're my only hope!"
- Me: Ctrl+S, please save this file
- Windows: Do you want to save it on SharepointOnedriveCloudthing?
- Me: Put it in the local Downloads folder FFS
- Windows: OMG it's too hard!
The guy is scanning eyeballs for a living, I don't believe he has any respect for a small text file in your web server.
Yes, it's common. No, it shouldn't be tolerated. Your boss/tech lead/whatever should be involved. Here is what should be done ideally:
- not following best practices: you MUST implement merge requests (GitLab, GitHub, etc.) and his code shouldn't be approved which means that his code won't ever be merged in a shitty state. Force 1 or 2 approvals for each MR, and it should not be possible to merge an MR if it has open comments. The boss should ask every day "why is your code not merged yet?" and he'll have to explain why people don't approve his shitty code.
- shitty unit-tests: same thing, the boss should show him how to do this, and the MR shouldn't be approved.
- breaking unit-tests: it's the job of the CI to literally block MRs that break unit-tests (whether it's code coverage or unit-tests).
- leaves me to fix it during PR approval: NO, it's HIS merge request, not yours.
To sum it up: devs must not approve his MRs, the CI must block MRs that break tests.
The same company that was modifying the content of the pages as an opt-out feature deeply hidden in the setting? (e.g. bitcoin stuff on every Reddit link)