It seems somewhat odd to me that, instead of addressing possible mechanisms of this correlation, the authors talk about how bullying is an evolutionary trait to pass on genes.
Yeah, that's why I want to get my hands on the study. Maybe the authors did consider that but the article is misrepresenting the study.
The next 2 generations might not witness the great collapse. What a relief!
Fuck the other generations though
/s
The general public and politicians weren't really worried.
Have you not had your morning coffee yet? ๐ The study purports that bullies have more kids, not that people with more kids were/are bullies. It investigated the relation in one single direction, not both.
Wouldn't surprise me. Unfortunately the study is behind a paywall.
I think being assertive and more socially active meaning you're more likely to be a bully is a bit of a myth.
You are reversing the implication that I'm guessing ๐
My guesses are that there ate multiple factors at play:
I'd try and look for papers to see if my guesses hold any water, but time eludes me.
They use Xitter and Facebook for warning people? You can't be serious... How do they not have a national alert system to send out alerts directly to phones? European countries have these and they are regularly tested too.
Not everybody has a Xitter or Facebook account ๐คทโโ๏ธ