I'm talking about various social benefits like welfare or disability that would ideally be replaced by a UBI.
I hear a lot of stories about this but I don't remember if they're Canadian or not; There's a lot of people who are on disability and are still capable of doing part time work or taking care of their kids for an hour every day for example, but they can't because if they're found doing anything, they lose all of their disability benefits. We want a system that allows them to do what they can and be rewarded for contributing to the best of their abilities rather than punishing them for it.
It's the same deal with welfare. You need to hit a certain income threshold before your take-home income surpasses what you'd get through welfare. Until then, you're putting a bunch of energy into working to make less money when you could be lounging at home and making more. This actively discourages people from bettering their lives.
In my opinion, the main appeal of UBI over other forms of support is that
That's not to say that you can't design a support system that doesn't have these issues, but with UBI, they're just trivially non-existent. No need for extra work in figuring out how to fix these problems.
I don't see how funding would be an issue unless you count the savings from letting people fall through the cracks. Shouldn't it cost the same to effectively support people in need regardless of how you distribute the money?
I like this better. It means fully worker owned corporations get to keep more of their earnings because it's more spread out. Discourages wealth concentration.
Hence all lives matter
Yann Lecun gave us convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in 1998. These are the models that are used for pretty much all specialized computer vision tasks even today. TinyEye came into existence ten years later in 2008. I can't tell you if they used CNNs, but they were certainly available.
Even conspiracies. Learn about where they come from and why they're wrong.
The value in daily notes is having a place to put things down without getting distracted from your main task. The important stuff doesn't stay there. You move them at a later time to their permanent homes.
It sounds like you might be looking at the left image with your right eye and the right image with your left eye. That's what happens when you cross your eyes instead of looking past the image.
But my question is, does it not count as being archived if it's exactly the same message that's posted to another platform that is archived?
It's double sided
I think it's valuable to have these discussions come up regularly because things change so quickly in this space. It's good to get a glimpse of what the current state of things are.
The Homework Machine, oh the Homework Machine,
Most perfect contraption that's ever been seen.
Just put in your homework, then drop in a dime,
Snap on the switch, and in ten seconds' time,
Your homework comes out, quick and clean as can be.
Here it is—"nine plus four?" and the answer is "three."
Three?
Oh me . . .
I guess it's not as perfect
As I thought it would be.
If there's insufficient space around it, then it'll never spawn anything. This can be useful if you want to keep a specific spawner around for capture later but don't want too spend resources on killing the constant stream of biters.
I haven't seen any numbers either for or against it, so I can't say anything about viability. If anyone knows enough to run the numbers, I'd like to see it. The problem with the calculations you show above is that you assume the value of money doesn’t change when the world around it changes, but it does. Especially so if you make a large change like implementing UBI. We need to think about this in terms of resources. The question you should be asking is whether there's enough food / housing / labour within the country to fulfill everyone's basic needs.