You missed the point.
The criticism here is that the EU is decising for the member states what they can be in debt for.
I personally am a federalist so I don't care much about EU overreach, all the opposite, but this is what the article criticises.
iglou
joined 3 weeks ago
I'm just confused as to how that is not common knowledge. The country I speak of is France, and we're not exactly known for our excellent maths education.
But they shouldn't ban anything else bad unless everything bad is banned. Fuck we can't ban shit
The problem is that inconsiderate smokers are actively hurting the health of the people suffering from their inconsideration. Passive smoking is a thing, and it has long term consequences.
So while it sucks for the individual freedom of considerate smokers like yourself, banning public smoking protects a lot of people who get their health damaged by what is in my experience in France most of the smokers. And protection is one of the purposes of the law.
No, it should simply be "Parenthesis, exponents, multiplication, addition."
A division is defined as a multiplication, and a substraction is defined as an addition.
I am so confused everytime I see people arguing about this, as this is basic real number arithmetics that every kid in my country learns at 12 yo, when moving on from the simplified version you learn in elementary school.
Yep, although not as white but that's because we're not massive fans of all these whitening stuff.
Someone needs to tell them about the Eurostar
I have answered, and had to put "Other" in employment status because I am self employed. An option for self employment would have been useful in my opinion!
Oh yes, I am so threatened. You got me.
Curious what the deal will be. I'll be furious if Ursula caves in to whatever absurd demands Trump has.
Afraid of what? Replying to what point? Your "shower thought" (lmao) is just a messy thought process of which every single step is based on nothing.
Why would we waste energy discussing consequences of events that will never happen?
view more: next ›
Who would have thought