[-] kittin@hexbear.net 36 points 3 days ago

Might have something to do with Putin very openly saying that would be an act of war

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 52 points 4 days ago

I wasn’t earning enough money so I decided to cut costs by not going to the office anymore and now they’ve fired me

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It’s not yet clear QC is even really possible.

There exist toys that prove it works in concept but it’s proving extremely difficult to scale these up to actually meaningful systems.

My understanding is that the core of the issue is the collapse of the wave function. QC works by exploiting quantum uncertainty and if the state collapses then the computation is over (or something like this, I’m not a physicist or QC expert.)

And the problem they’re facing is how to make systems that are much larger and therefore capable of computing more, but the larger a system is the sooner it will collapse.

It could be that it’s simply impossible or uneconomically difficult to make systems large enough to actually be of use and value.

Maybe this is a solveable problem, maybe it’s actually not. But QC is in the same bucket as cold fusion as a technology that would be extremely useful and we have reasons to believe it might be possible to actually do based on theory but it’s proving impossible to implement in practice.

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago

Aww it’s no longer possible to create Reddit accounts without an email via old

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 33 points 6 days ago

Petition to change the country of the week to Saudi Arabia in honor of the festivities

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 29 points 6 days ago

Everything under the sun is connected epstein

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 24 points 6 days ago

Huh weird this happens just after Iran gets angry at Russia for not respecting their interests.

Nothing like a mutually beneficial oil pipeline to settle regional differences.

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 32 points 6 days ago

Some of you are alright don’t come to earth tomorrow

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 39 points 6 days ago

Doing my part for white replacement by not reproducing

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 22 points 6 days ago

I have read that Ukraine has pulled the HIMARS back, giving up on the battle over those pontoon bridges, as a result of losing so many systems for no meaningful gain.

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 33 points 6 days ago

Office block down

officer-down

53
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by kittin@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

I have a good friend who is generally good politically, not one of us but not bad. A socdem who is aware enough to know NATO is bad and Palestine deserves justice etc.

They’re very strong on feminism, advanced. More than me by far and I value their pov on feminism. A lot.

But they have Islamophobe brainworms. Mostly surrounding sexual violence in Europe by Muslims. They have a suite of rage bait statistics or anecdotes of sexual violence by Muslim men in Europe.

“See this isolated and context-free statistic which shows really the problem is Islam and the cultural values of these immigrants.”

The discussion for them becomes rooted in feminism.

“Why should women pay the price for all the sexual violence Muslim men bring with them? Honor killings are 100% Muslim!”

“X% of rapes are by muslims when they are only Y% of the population.”

“Why are all the immigrants men? We should ban the male refugees from these places, but as a good pro-refugee progressive we should allow the women and children in because they aren’t a problem.”

It’s tempting to try and fight this on data but I think that would kind of be conceding the deeper clash of civilizations argument in some way?

It’s also tempting to fight this on the grounds of material circumstances and point out that gender equality largely follows economic development but then that’s really just entirely conceding to the world view that Islamic immigration is an affliction upon European women for several generations until they assimilate.

I think a core problem here is that I am completely disconnected and unaware of what feminism looks like in the Muslim worlds and so I can’t speak to or challenge the underlying Islamophobia.

Of course there are issues with patriarchy in the Islamic world and when my friend points to the veil in Iran being enforced by the religious police and it’s impossible for me to deny that and I completely agree with them (while disagreeing with them insofar as I totally accept many Muslim women choose to wear it but then it becomes a complex go-nowhere discussion about peer pressure and bikinis) but then there’s this bridge from that true fact to the assertion that Islamic men are a threat to European women which is just like woah man wtf.

How do I approach this? Where’s my Muslim-world feminist perspective at? What are some considered debunks or analyses of the use of isolated statistics on sexual violence?

Like the best internet gotcha would be a statistical analysis that simply debunks the sexual violence statistics and that would be helpful but I believe there’s a deeper Islamophobia and sense of western cultural supremacy, clash of civilizations, thesis that they don’t explicitly acknowledge and I sense that feminism is being abused to ennoble that.

And on the flip side, I’m a male. I’m very unlikely to be a victim of sexual violence at this point in my life. I’m not going to be a victim of an honor killing. Do I have privilege I need to check here?

Overall I think the best would be for me to discover and learn feminist theory and female perspectives from Muslim / Arabic / Palestinian / Iranian / Afghan / Pakistani authors, both in the “Muslim world” and from those living in the west.

Maybe it would also be useful to look at how panic about black men raping women was used and is used to justify racial oppression as a consciousness raising exercise?

Considered feminist critiques of Islam?

Considered feminist critiques of Islamophobia in Europe?

view more: next ›

kittin

joined 1 month ago