kixik

https://librewolf.net/docs/faq/#can-i-use-firefox-sync-with-librewolf-is-it-safe-to-do-so

(things change quickly though, given Mozilla Corp decisions)

Thanks !

What's the error you get? Perhaps someone has dealt with it before. What overrides have you tried?

There are several things that might affect some sites and are more troublesome than others, for example:

• security.OCSP.require
• webgl.disabled (if changed to false it's recommended to use the CanvasBlocker extension)

ublockOrigin can give trouble to some sites, a quick test is to temporarily disable it and see if the site works. It can be investigated further what specific filter might be affecting the site.

Librewolf is a privacy oriented fork of Firefox, it grabs some setting from arkenfox. Betterbird is not a privacy oriented fork of Thunderbird as far as I remember. When I tried it the only thing I was attracted to was its tray support, but as I use non DE compositors, so far wayfire, labwc and sway (tabbed layout), and as there's currently a Firefox bug, I didn't see any reason to keep trying it, and now on sway with tabbed layout I see no reason for a tray any ways...

Well there's already a browser on the works, verso, and it also attempts to make servo "embeddable":

We aim to explore embedding solutions for Servo

Hopefully both project reach 1.0 sooner rather than later. Meanwhile there's Librewolf at least, and there was Mull, but instead currently there's IronFox and also FrozenFennec on the works as well, all forks of Firefox oriented to privacy.

Have you tried enabling webgl, which by default is disable on Librewolf? You can do that by overwriting the corresponding setting, as it can be done for any Librewolf setting, in particular the webgl override needed is:

defaultPref("webgl.disabled", false);

If you do, Librewolf recommend using the extension "CanvasBlocker" given the fingerprinting allowed by webgl. There's a settings doc BTW..

Corps are for profit, and Mozilla is a Corp... Really sad times indeed.

see this other post: https://lemmy.ml/post/26518180/16957376

Hint, look at the date this gets pushed, :)

do you mean you use a more privacy oriented fork like Librewolf, or instead some chrome/chromium derivative or fork?

I don't agree with what is written in that blog BTW, 1st I like that there's a repo that at least tries as best as it can to protect the free software aspect of the apps, which many disregard but are pretty important to me, that's one of the main values from f-droid for me. Proprietary binary components can include many invasive "features" one is not aware of. As requirement the source code and building from it is required. If you build from source, removing proprietary dependencies for example you'll get a different binary, and that requires a new signature on the final package. F-droid has improved a lot on reproducible builds. And I've read in several places magnifying the issue of apks from official f-droid being moths later compared to original developer release, my own experience is different, and when I've written, I immediately get a reaction from someone which doesn't agree with me (I never reply back). I've read about the single entity signature, but that alone should not be an issue, otherwise we would be distrusting packages from debian, arch, and so on, which use a set of signatures to sign all of their packages, particularly when the build and signing process is automated, in some distros most packages come signed by the same bot. The issue about using a VM with a LTS distro about to expire or already expired is a valid one, but can you blame them when migrating breaks their flows and they don't have enough hands, and that got overcome any ways. Now a days things are working fine AFAIK. That the clients support multiple repos violate an android policy, oh well, I don't care much about android policies, and google for that matter, which collects a ton of data from users and people forgets about what that means, but what a bad practice not to follow those policies.

I believe some people really dislike free software, which is not the same as open source, one really need to value the four basic freedoms it procures, and if one doesn't give a dumb for whatever reason then one doesn't really appreciate free software, perhaps all one wants is not paid software, which is not the same. Free has two meanings and people often gets confused, and f-droid is about free software. It's true they can't guarantee every single bit of their content, but they trying through their policies and a few scripts has value to me, and taking a look at what free software meaning and the basic freedoms it looks to preserve is important to be understood before complaining about an organization trying to offer free software. It would be more appropriate if the terminology changes to use the spanish "libre" word instead, but it is what it is, that why sometimes FOSS is instead referred as FLOS (free/libre or free and libre). And true, as a result developers who want to provide apks through f-droid and also through non free software app stores or repos (whatever makes more sense) need to have in place something to account for the differences, and that's not optimal, but there's a good reason for it, but some developers just don't want to do it and even less not depending on android proprietary stuff or other proprietary stuff for that matter, which is their prerogative any ways.

A little rant of mine, not we all have to agree over the same arguments I guess.

That was so long ago, haha, it's governed by these:

// disable captive portal
pref("network.captive-portal-service.enabled", false);
pref("captivedetect.canonicalURL", "");

The first can be easily changed to true in ~/.librewolf/librewolf.overrides.cfg or equivalent. The 2nd can be overwritten as well, but whether you look at FF to see what it has by default, or you use any more private site of choice for Librewolf to try to connect to, to test captive-portal. So yes, one can overwrite anything as long as you know what you're doing...

Well, it is available on the IzzyOnDroid separate f-droid repo, so if using the f-droid client, you can still grab freetubeAndroid with it.

Never tried it though, and not sure how bloated for a phone, but it's easy to install/update with any f-droid client.