leem

How!?

Same. This is all I've seen from them and there's no source to be found.

I hope they make an example out of Twitter too. Especially since other companies (ahem) are looking to Musk for ideas on how to run themselves.

The fox has some serious top energy~

there's foxbot on telegram too. it's usually easier for me to paste the image in there, and it can find sources most of the time

There are some subreddits I miss, but I don't think here is the appropriate place for them (topics that aren't really furry at all, where it could hurt them being based in a primarily nsfw instance), nor do I have the bandwidth to handle moderation.

Maybe we could keep a list of ideas around so if someone's inclined to start a community on here, they have an idea of what people want to contribute to?

On the topic of the local timeline getting diluted, that's inevitable and shouldn't be a concern in the long run.

omg

Fox's ship is in the docking bay.

😳 i can see why

As Lemmy matures, I bet we'll get a lot more granular controls of nsfw content that shows up in your feeds. In my case, I'd like these controls:

• hot/top/new feeds: only want to see nsfw from my instance, maybe a couple of others. Ideally there'd be tag separation between porn and general nsfw, but having too granular of tags can quickly get out of hand.
• viewing community pages: I'd want to see everything posted, nsfw or not, if I navigate to a community itself.

I've just been blocking the communities I don't want to see as they pop up on the main feed, which has been working alright.

Section 230 (often called the 26 words that created the internet) reads:

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

Wikipedia also says:

Section 230(c)(2) further provides "Good Samaritan" protection from civil liability for operators of interactive computer services in the good faith removal or moderation of third-party material they deem "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected."

I'm also not a lawyer so I have no clue what the ramifications for this are, but I'm guessing that Reddit isn't liable for stuff people upload as long as the illegal stuff gets removed.

If Reddit undeletes a post, could they be treated as the publisher? At the very least it sounds not very good-samaritan-y of them to do that, so maybe they wouldn't be protected in that case.

BTW, the supreme court heard a few cases centered around section 230 a few months ago! And Biden called for it to be reformed! So depending on how that goes, the internet could get shaken up soon. We're in some interesting times.

LOL thanks for checking that out. i was on mobile and didn't want to figure out how to read the contents.