[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

wot? please explain, with diagrams!

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

its the point where people say "but a sneaky vpn will get around so we may as well do nothing" is equivalent to "my friend can buy me a sneaky drink so we may as well do nothing"... just because you can exploit a law doesn't make it invalid. enforcement concerns are valid, but it seems reasonable to start with "i agree there is a problem" and go for the 80% rule

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

i feel like i need more goob in my life. do you sell rulers?

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

technology related muscle memory? once people learn a thing, its hard to convince them to relearn something new ... especially when you "are just doing the same thing anyway".

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

ah, i get it. thanks. i was thinking that the insurance mentioned would be part of what the government is providing, not a for-profit bizness. essentially what you are suggesting also :)

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

im genuinely trying to understand your concern.. is it as simple as that you dont want to contribute your money to a greater good?

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

nope nope nope.

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

good commentary, covered a lot of ground - appreciate the effort to write it up :)

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

if you secure debt against them, they should be taxed?

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

does anyone actually want that? seems beyond the original use case

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

i've seen salt with high fructose corn syrup added to it... so technically less salt?

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

ferpectly cromulent!

view more: next ›

lightsblinken

joined 3 months ago