30
submitted 9 months ago by lonewalk@lemm.ee to c/programming@beehaw.org

insomnia just enshittified itself and requires cloud login like postman, and force upgrades you from the old version even if you disable updates. this blocked me at work today.

this client looks great, wanted to boost it here in case anyone else got screwed by Insomnia this morning.

169

insomnia just enshittified itself and requires cloud login like postman, and force upgrades you from the old version even if you disable updates. this blocked me at work today.

this client looks great, wanted to boost it here in case anyone else got screwed by Insomnia this morning.

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 51 points 9 months ago

Dickinson, however, said internal studies showed some 88% of his civilian workforce would not leave Colorado Springs for Alabama.

💀

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago

wait, it’s all enshittification?

always has been

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 22 points 9 months ago

An unethical, evil bastard society that ought to be extinct.

Unequivocally, death to eugenics.

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 60 points 9 months ago

sorry for the potentially dumb remark but… couldn’t you just avoid navigating to QAnon websites? I’ve never had an issue unintentionally navigating to one. It also seems like this repo owner is quite opinionated and trying to create a “no bad sites” filter list, which… honestly, you can control your own destiny with web browsing.

if this is to protect kids on your network, I think it’s probably a good idea to have a broader conversation with them about evaluating sources, tell them about media bias checking sites, and just generally educating them on red flags to distrust. This will probably serve them much better than trying to block right wing sites, especially since plenty of normal websites have harmful right wing content. YouTube in particular disseminates extremely misleading and harmful material via ads (lots of anti-trans hate speech).

In any case, I can’t find another repo - if you need the filter still, maybe you could fork the list yourself, and remove anything that you don’t find objectionable? (again, I feel like this is an example of why to not rely on a third party to block websites based off opinion/politics)

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago

Keep in mind there’s everyone not in tech. Loads of people probably use their iPhone and MacBooks, or windows and android, or some other combo - might never even look up a single Linux distro, or think about what servers are.

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Control center via the side button has been persistently frustrating to get used to. Feeling like a boomer (in my 20s?!) but I consistently swipe up, get to the useless screen below the face, curse at my watch, and then hit the side button to open control center.

Every. Single. Time.

And I’ve been using this since the betas started.

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 74 points 9 months ago

So I mean, if this was in lieu of data collection and tracking, this is what more of the software world should actually do. Running platforms isn’t free, and making the user the product is a malicious and unsustainable solution.

That said, I certainly wouldn’t pay Twitter - I think I’d rather donate to a Mastodon instance, or pay for some other private alternative. Musk is awful for so many reasons, holds way too much power, and deserves no money of mine.

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 117 points 10 months ago

Godspeed Godot, fuck every single tech company enshittifying the whole sector to hell.

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This just feels like non-technical fear mongering. Frankly, the term “AI” is just way too overused for any of this to be useful - Autopilot, manufacturing robots, and ChatGPT are all distinct systems that have their own concerns, tradeoffs, regulatory issues, etc. and trying to lump them together reduces the capacity for discussion down to a single (not very useful, imo) take

editing for clarity: I’m for discussion of more regulation and caution, but conflating tons of disparate technologies still imo muddies the waters of public discussion

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 175 points 10 months ago

The traffic argument is so infuriating. When will American journalism, and Americans at large, realize the very simple truth: no large city in the US will ever exist without traffic, without a fundamental shift from our car-centric culture and development to transit-oriented?

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago

actually though how do you justify charging for your normal bloody unaltered logo lmfao

[-] lonewalk@lemm.ee 106 points 1 year ago

fuck spez, viva la fediverse

290
submitted 1 year ago by lonewalk@lemm.ee to c/reddit@lemmy.world
5
submitted 1 year ago by lonewalk@lemm.ee to c/sandiego@lemmy.world

Took this while biking around for fun on my e-bike; actually quite impressed at the quality of bike lane over the bridge. Looks new: https://www.sandiego.gov/cip/projectinfo/featuredprojects/bridge-replacement

A lot of people I know tend to discount the possibility of getting around the city without a car, and it's certainly still janky, but it's really cool to see new infrastructure going in for pedestrians/cyclists. It's honestly surprised me how doable it is to get to different parts of the city with an e-bike. Very cool to see!

Definitely recommend people cruise through if they've got an e-bike / are confident enough on a regular bike to deal with some of the janky traffic around the bridge.

view more: next ›

lonewalk

joined 1 year ago