[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I am also wondering who is going to actually handle ranking the tens of thousands of existing cards(gatherer says 28712 legal in commander at this moment), plus hundreds more from each set as they release. Might need to be crowdsourced to be done in a reasonable time. Every deckbuilding website is also going to want to implement that info in their database.

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 3 points 4 days ago

Would be some nice karma if wotc taking over caused prices of some of the most expensive stuff to drop due to the uncertainty of the future of the format.

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 6 points 5 days ago

I get the idea, but I don't see how that works effectively in practice. There are a lot of cards that are not good on their own, and only good in the context of a combo. Does having one of those cards in your deck make it better? No, it probably makes it worse. You need the entire combo for one of those cards to matter.

It works for those 1 off value piece cards like Dockside, Tomb, Sol Ring, etc. But multi card combos is where I think it will fail(or at least over score a deck that doesn't include a full combo).

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 36 points 2 months ago

My current wizard character didn't take counterspell until the dm sent a wizard at us with it first. He had no one to blame but himself.

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 6 points 5 months ago

It being one of the things they want "uncensored" is revealing.

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 6 points 5 months ago

Kinda neat to create a way to experience an older expansion that many newer players missed, outside of the Classic method.

Shane it is time limited and not a permanent thing, though.

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 13 points 9 months ago

Sodium-ion are being applied in real world use cases.

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 7 points 10 months ago

Support ranked choice voting first. Once we have that, a huge portion of the power the two parties have will fall away

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 16 points 1 year ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_age_problem

We estimate the age of some stars to be older than the estimated age of the universe. JWST observations have also made it "worse". https://youtu.be/hps-HfpL1vc?si=H9tdTD3DJYLkalvx

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 28 points 1 year ago

That last bit is the important thing. If someone tells you pronouns, use them. If someone tells you they prefer "they/them" and you keep using he or she on purpose, you are disrespecting them.

We all make mistakes sometimes and most people I've met who use alternative pronouns that may conflict with their socially expected appearance don't mind correcting someone a few times or will brush it off a few times, but more than that, especially if you see and interact with this person regularly, you become an asshole.

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but no. My company is working in a proprietary engine, so there is almost no one we can hire with that engine experience, but we still want people who became familiar and strong with other engines because they can do it again with ours.

Don't be too discouraged by this, but start learning your next engine.

13

Currently when you cast a spell, you don't get the choice between "regular" spell slots and pact magic slots, it seems to usually use the slot type of the class which granted you the spell or feature first, then can switch over when the slots of that level are expended. EG I have a Pally 6/warlock 2, so 4 first level does from pally and 2 from warlock. Don't have the option to spend warlock slots first for things like smite or healing. But if I run out of regular slots, I can use the warlock ones to smite.

Anyone know if a mod or anything to improve this multiclassed setup?

43

All proceeds go to Malala Fund

[-] luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com 10 points 1 year ago

It sounds like it depended on an FDA rule that was changed this year.

28

They had a very draconian rule about men who have had sex with men being unable to donate. That rule has been removed, and instead the same rule will apply to everyone, regardless of sexual orientation.

The new rule is: "Any individual, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, who has had new or multiple sexual partners in the last three months, and also had anal sex in that timeframe, will be asked to wait three months to donate blood from last anal sex contact. Individuals who have had anal sex in the last three months may be eligible to donate as long as they did not have sex with someone new or with multiple partners during that timeframe."

view more: next ›

luxyr42

joined 1 year ago