A problem with this is that the river presumably goes all the way around the earth. Otherwise you could just travel west until you found its end. You really need a donut shaped earth, a sphere doesn't help much
maxwellfire
I quite like my dynalink wrx36. It's quad core ARM with 1GB of ram, and supports WiFi 6. Sadly it appears to no longer be available, but it wasn't very expensive (like $80 or $90 when I bought it).
I think a lot of the openwrt wiki recommended routers page is massively out of date. Or at least it was when I was searching two years ago.
I wanted something that could actually saturate a 1Gb link, which my previous archer a7 really struggled to do, I think because of the CPU limitations. It also got annoying having to choose openwrt packages with the very limited ram.
The top two comments on the reddit thread you linked seem correct. The MT6000 seems good in light of the dynalink being gone, but it's recently expensive at $150 or more
Sadly this is an inaccurate illustration drawn by an artist and not an actual image :(. Black holes look both pretty different and cooler than that (like more interstellar vibes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMT_EGXQwyk
I'm not all the way through it but the first part is pretty cool
What's saturated light and what is bingodabbing?
That's kinda an insane amount of ram for most simulations. Is this like a machine learning thing? Is his python code just super unoptimized? Is it possible he's making a bunch of big objects and then not freeing the references when he's done with them so they're never garbage collected?
You can always do that though since you can dualboot to whatever other system you want. I thought their idea was to have a mode you turn on and off in your main system, but I think that's just how kernel anti-cheat would already work.
Looks really nice!
Like astrsk, I feel like the stroke might be slightly too thick at some sizes. I would make it approximately 20% thinner. (Though depending on how these are constructed that might be too much work. If so, it's not bad as is)
I think what they're suggesting is literally just kernel anti-cheat itself. Am I missing something?
Yeah. It has easier sandboxing. You can accomplish most of the same things with traditional packages with something like apparmour, but flatpak has motivated the development of portals which allows apps to request permissions on the fly more easily.
As far as I can tell, the lawsuit alleges that steam threatened pulling their (wolfire games) steam sales if they sold elsewhere for cheaper. Which would be bad if true. However, this does not appear to be anywhere in steam's actual seller agreement. The only clause in that agreement is about steam keys being sold for cheaper, which is why the other poster was focusing on that.
That allegation seems to be that steam in practice is threatening things that are outside of the contract itself.
Edit: I read the emails from the lawsuit discovery (page 160–) and it seems like most of them are about steam keys and their policy on that, which seems more reasonable. But there are definitely a few emails that explicitly go beyond that
"You can definitely participate in sales off- steam, and we don’t want to discourage or prevent that. But in terms of promo visibility, regardless of Steam keys, we do try to think really hard about customers and put ourselves in their shoes. If the game is discounted down to $15 on Steam, and then it goes into a bundle or subscription with ten other games for $6 a few days or weeks later.., that really sucks for the people who bought at the way higher price! Why did you market me a $15 price if the game is actually selling for more like $1 somewhere else? For instance, we’d probably want to avoid running a 50% discount on a game if it was going to be a free giveaway on another store a week later, even if the giveaway had nothing to do with Steam Keys."
Which seems pretty straightforward. Some of the other emails also imply that they might choose not to sell the game at all on steam if you do that.
You run into it on the planet backside and then need another bridge, right?