[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

(especially since it isn’t, not by a long shot)

It kinda is, though. Their competitors do not matter. Not even when funded by jumbo swinging dicks like Epic.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 hours ago

Headline should read, Heritage Foundation threatens bloodshed.

This is like reporting that a mob boss said it'd be terrible if something happened to your family.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 hours ago

The alternative is an 80-year-old moron saying he plans to kill you a little.

Fuck this OP.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

I saw Junji Ito illustrations as decorative socks today.

The Nagatoro guy has some... archives.

You will live to see manmade horrors beyond your comprehension become billboards.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Well, someone did.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

What'd the five fingers say to the face? SHLAP!

What'd Boris's face say to those five fingers? Achoo.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 hours ago

... because Katko used a mousetrap and a shotgun shell to blow a dude's leg off. Over some antique jars.

It's one of those cases where the jury immediately knows a line has been crossed and just needs to hash out how far back.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Jesus Christ the comments are even better.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 12 points 13 hours ago

On reflection, the real question is whether you're home at the time, since that makes it the castle doctrine instead of "defense of property." At which point you're free to go full Home Alone a la Last Crusade. The penitent doorkicker kneels! bzzZZZzzzt

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 19 points 13 hours ago

Does a booby-trap that only responds to lethal force technically pass the Katko test?

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

And there's no way one side has valid concerns and the other is fucking crazy.

Both sides, says one side.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

The nature of bad faith is that there is no right answer. Fuck off with this.

1
3
10
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by mindbleach@sh.itjust.works to c/digital_circus@lemmy.zip
1
Couples' outfits (imgur.com)

Source.

Previously posted on the other site.

2
-2

'Well it's only passing mv a list of--' yeah yeah yeah, I know, and that's why I'm calling bullshit. It should be massively harder to execute filenames. Even if 1970s decisions make that the eternal hideous default: the lack of any idiot-proof standard workaround is incomprehensible.

StackOverflow's full of competing one-liners and people pointing out how each one is considered harmful. The least-skeezy options use exec. That sentence should make anyone recoil in horror.

This is not a filename problem. This is a tool problem. If a single printable character is going to silently expand into a list of names, then for god's sake, having it put each name in quotes should be fucking trivial.

3

Reviewing an even blend of McMansions, recent insurance write-offs, and incomprehensible follies.

0

Pleasant warbling synths forever.

-1

You're gonna have a bad time.

0

Instrumental grooves with just a little bit of Del Shannon.

view more: next ›

mindbleach

joined 10 months ago