[-] nkey@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Very true for the GPL code, but Red Hat adds code that isn’t GPL to the distro. So your downstream distros would have to cherry pick that code out.

[-] nkey@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

That's great to hear! It took me a few evenings wrap my head around it, but now I'm really enjoying it. There's a great community as well!

[-] nkey@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

This was my initial thought as well, but I imagine that would violate the terms of their subscription and Red Hat could just revoke their access going forward.

[-] nkey@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Edit: spelling

I would never consider Fedora bleeding edge, but that being said, after the Red Hat lawyers forced the removal of H.264 I did end up hopping after 5 very great years with Fedora. If you're up for learning something new NixOS is a lot of fun.

[-] nkey@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago

RHEL hasn't gone closed source, it still complies with the GPL. If they provide you a binary, they must and will continue to provide you with the source code. I feel like this is like when they announced Centos Stream as a "rolling distro", their messaging is awful, and the optics are bad. I feel this is more to stick it to Oracle and unfortunately, Alma and Rocky are just getting caught in the crossfire.

nkey

joined 1 year ago