[-] philwills@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

Interesting idea... Thanks!

[-] philwills@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

I really wish Microsoft would release the original swype again... Pretty sure I read somewhere that they're the current owners (due to acquisitions).

[-] philwills@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

For 30 bucks... I'd hang on to it in the hopes I can find an unlock.

[-] philwills@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago

I would like that! Very much!

[-] philwills@programming.dev 35 points 7 months ago

Man... I thought this was going to be a proper rant about using maps where you should be using other things... No, it's a make sure you type your function inputs rant...

[-] philwills@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You probably already thought of this, but just in case, are you switching to normal before calling the command switch panes?

inoremap <silent> <c-h> <esc>:silent call TmuxMove('h')<cr>

Edit: if this doesn't work I give up...

[-] philwills@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ah, yes... good old sqlite... I guess the main reason I go the route I go is that I like writing map/ reduce functions... much more than reorganizing tables because I structured them poorly to start.

In fact, the project I'm on right now at paid job has a lot of structure transformation... and I'm enjoying it so much that I'm not even pining for one of my million side projects.

While it's not the most performant way to do things, I feel like data structure manipulation is one of the easiest to read ways to get from point a to point b.

[-] philwills@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

Except when you're not worried about scale because you're building a small side project... I don't want to pay for a db (or the hardware to host it) for my play projects. My in-home play server is a very old home PC that is very underpowered for today's software.

[-] philwills@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

API gateway all the things... it's annoying at times, but I don't want to have to manage a dbs... or write SQL.

Of course, there's always some data store to manage, but I prefer the ones with fewer switches and easier scaling (like DynamoDB).

In the end, it's a matter of preference. I prefer writing custom map reduce functions, you prefer SQL indexes.

Honestly, the amount of requests and data I'm handling for personal projects could be easily handled by the filesystem... so, ddb is great and I stay free tier... like always.

[-] philwills@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

I'm seriously very surprised to still see so many relational databases in the top responses... guess I'm just in fantasy land. I hate writing SQL... good at it, but it's not fun (to me).

[-] philwills@programming.dev -2 points 10 months ago

/me Sort by top

wat

[-] philwills@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

Often, the documentation explains the why... The code (without documenting comments of course) only every tells you how...

view more: next ›

philwills

joined 10 months ago