I mean, a congress member seems to be saying he can. If he "can't" he'll do it anyways, it'll go to the supreme court and they'll say it's fine.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10186
Edit: apparently that's actually part of what Joe Arpaio was pardoned for.
Sure, but the president can (and will) pardon any of them.
I'd imagine it's not doable because of how quickly they'd develop insane amounts of heat.
Wasn't Trump literally trying to bring it back last time?
https://whyy.org/articles/trump-wants-to-make-asbestos-great-again/
Diesel subs are also different kinds of beasts. They're terrible for international conflict, but for short range operations, they're silent. You can turn off a diesel engine, but not a nuclear reactor.
I mean the hardliners were definitely opposed, and Ben Gurion had misgivings.
You're talking 1947? The wiki article differs unless I'm misunderstanding you.
It's been a while since I've read about this, so I genuinely may be misremembering. Apologies if so!
Yeah, there was actually Israeli terrorism on British government buildings in the region.
Iirc the Israelis were happy with this. Right or wrong, their Arab neighbors and Palestine immediately declared war on them while they were celebrating.
And remember, the courts can't consider motive, so as long as tariffs are defendable as an official act (which they are) he's 100% immune. I mean, they found him immune in the Stormy Daniels hush money case, and that was related to campaign finance as a candidate.
The patient doesn't seem to find it so unpleasant. 😏
Apparently not really. It already happened with Sheriff Joe Arpaio. This country is fucked lmao.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardon_of_Joe_Arpaio#%3A%7E%3Atext=On+August+25%2C+2017%2C+President%2Cbeing+in+the+U.S.+illegally%22.