If he introduced the hobbits to breakfast burritos and breakfast tacos, I'm pretty sure all would be forgiven.
qjkxbmwvz
I would bet that if you remux BBB to an mkv and play that through JF, it won't transcode
I think it will just remux it back to mp4. Just a guess...
Interesting
I wonder if it only displays the first reason for having to mess with the stream, e.g., if it's really that it's an unsupported container, video, and audio codec.
Possible to try playing an h264 mkv (maybe Big Buck Bunny)? Since your screenshot is h265 I wonder if it indeed needs to transcode because that's unsupported (in addition to mkv).
unless everyone is using hardware acceleration
I think that's what (almost) everyone does. My little N100 works just fine with QSV.
Is it definitely transcoding? JF can remix without transcoding iirc.
IIRC chvt
is a privileged command, which makes sense (if an unprivileged user could execute this command they could effectively brick the computer for a local user).
That said, my understanding is that modern DE's are given a lot of access, so presumably chvt
is allowed (and in this case, is required because as others mentioned, password is required). So the only other option is to fail unlocked, which is all kinds of Bad.
No longer available I guess, but I got this: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0DDX1K5S1
Only complaints are that it will thermal throttle on long workloads (e.g., transcoding or facial recognition on my entire Immich library), and the SSD slots
it comes with an mSATA drive in the first slot which is 4 lanes (I think?) and supports mSATA and NVME. The second slot is slower (1 lane?) and only supports NVME. So I had to put my nicer NVME SSD in that slot if I wanted to use the included mSATA drive, but consequently the NVME speed is slower than it should be. (I could swap it to the fast slot but then I couldn't use the included mSATA drive.)
For my use case, both minor issues.
And over twice the GDP.
"Wow you signed the document in blood, you must be really hardcore."
"No I'm just cheap."
That's...pretty believable.
proxmox nudes
No judgement here, you just keep doing what makes you happy.
I could be wrong, but I think this could be due to how the states' suit is worded? As in, I think it's worded as, "you can't do that in our state," and not, "you can't do that full stop."
From another site:
(My emphasis.)
So, a good first step, and while this should be struck down in its entirety, my reading is that this was a lawsuit with limited scope, and the injunction matches the limited scope.