[-] randombit 13 points 1 year ago

I think this could be very valuable for the community and the Lemmy devs. However, I believe to be successful, there needs to be a volunteer(s) who “sync” the community to the GitHub issues. We could automate this but that would make the situation worse. Here’s how I could imagine this working:

When a new feature or bug is posted, the mod determines if this is duplicated or not. If so, they will reply to the post with a link to the previous post and lock the current one. If it is truly new, the community can vote and comment. After a week or so, if the community supports the new feature or fixing the bug, the mod will open a new GitHub issue with a summary of the community discussion and link to the discussion.

This is a lot of work for the mods, but I believe it would really add value for both the Lemmy community and the devs.

[-] randombit 13 points 1 year ago

"There are 5 games written in Rust and 50 game engines.” — Interview with Senior Rust Developer in 2023

[-] randombit 14 points 1 year ago

In C/C++, undefined should be the meme of the little girl smiling while the house burns down behind her.

[-] randombit 12 points 1 year ago

Soon 99% of all phone conversations will be chat bots talking to chat bots.

[-] randombit 12 points 1 year ago

I was thinking the same thing, however, I don’t know how to solve the bot issue. The value of StackOverflow is the upvoting of best answers but that becomes difficult to achieve without a solid user reputation system. However, as we saw with Reddit, this tends to reward “group think” and punishes divergent opinions.

[-] randombit 10 points 1 year ago

If an instance has an onion address, the text will come through Tor; however, pictures from other instances will still go through exit nodes since only the instance that hosts a community serves the media. My understanding is that Kbin federates everything but I haven’t used it and am unsure how it interacts with a Lemmy for media.

[-] randombit 11 points 1 year ago

We’re all figuring this out as we go! Since the great Reddit migration, we’ve already seen our first big drama with the Beehaw defederation. Some Beehaw users disagreed and left for other instances while users of other instances liked the move and joined Beehaw. The Lemmy fediverse is what WE make it for better or for worse.

[-] randombit 14 points 1 year ago

Thanks for volunteering and stepping up. Modding ain’t easy, but it’s necessary.

[-] randombit 12 points 1 year ago

I’m sure the developer feels absolutely crushed by the increased sales.

[-] randombit 13 points 1 year ago

If licking a microphone is sexual, is eating a banana on stream now obscene?

[-] randombit 13 points 1 year ago
[-] randombit 14 points 1 year ago

I've done a bit more research into the legality of "lolicon" content in the US (where SDF is hosted). IANAL, however, Federal law 18 U.S. Code § 1466A states:

Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
(a) In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
    (1)
        (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
        (B) is obscene; or
    (2)
        (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
        (B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.

The Department of Justice's Citizen's Guide To U.S. Federal Child Exploitation And Obscenity Laws states that "lolicon" is illegal and has a lower standard than obscenity in adult pornography.

In addition, Section 1466A of Title 18, United State Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene. This statute offers an alternative 2-pronged test for obscenity with a lower threshold than the Miller test. The matter involving minors can be deemed obscene if it (i) depicts an image that is, or appears to be a minor engaged in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse and (ii) if the image lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. A first time offender convicted under this statute faces fines and at least 5 years to a maximum of 20 years in prison.

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a conviction under 1466A in UNITED STATES v. WHORLEY (2008).

The Lemmy instance Burggit explicitly allows "lolicon" content:

Cooking up a platform for Free Thought And Expression! (NSFW & Loli/Shota/Cub friendly!) Minimal Restrictions on Content/Speech.

Since Burggit hosts content that is illegal in SDF's jurisdiction, I would support SDF defederating from Burggit.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

randombit

joined 1 year ago