shinigamiookamiryuu

I'm not sure how you gathered that thought (the ongoing slander about me maybe, though I would hope nobody sees deflection towards that from a discussion about death is fair). I know that the killer didn't even try to not escalate things.

Consider for a moment where we are six months later: a new CEO who is more or less the same as the old one with the same limited powers, industrial rules that haven't changed because the system is more complicated than that, a dead CEO whose death sent a shockwave in his family and sphere of influence, and a killer who A) is either afraid to show himself, or B) was afraid and got caught after fleeing only to become a prison cult following, with his own health system not having changed because he never tried doing something like suing and was never insured with the CEO's insurance to begin with (among other red flags that prop up).

I'm not standing up for the damned. I'm standing up to overkill. Not sure how me describing precision of justice should earn my words the adjectives you give them, not to mention my denomination doesn't even adhere to regular notions of Hell.

There are maybe a few hundred people (if not a few thousand) in this ML community. For every one person who thinks what happened was overkill, another five are praising the killer, hence the memes that paint him as a literal saint. Surely an unreluctance for violence isn't a pillar or prerequisite for Marxist-Leninism (especially in a discussion about people hiding their affiliations), right? I'm not cheering for either side, but one side resorted to murder when they could've, I don't know, sued.

This is the kind of thing I am referring to and which brings us to the OP's situation to start out with. The way things ended, especially when the killer wasn't even insured with the person's insurance or could've just sued, isn't the way to go.

People often worry the democratic process isn't functional, correct? Well, the way to deal with things peacefully was wide open, and the killer instead opted for something to make a statement, presumably for the fame (according to all the psychoanalysis, though I don't pretend that's infallible).

I'm confused. I was responding to the part of the question about confrontations and people disguising themselves and explaining that there was more to it than that. What did I do wrong?

So I should start by saying I'm not a Communist (albeit many of my ideas are technically "socialist", and I took a quiz once to make sure) but that I don't disrespect Communists as the stereotype shows. There are several mindsets and Communism is just another mindset. For me, the "feeling" of red scare doesn't come from their ideas, it comes from the pushiness experienced. I have been on the receiving end of several difficult times simply because I had even minor disagreements with Communists, such as whether anyone should be advocating assassinations (I don't think so). When I see a whole swath of people cheering for some guy who travelled to NYC to eliminate someone who was actually himself trying to fix a system he was put in charge of, it is without any doubt in the world that I'm going to have serious misanthropic contemplations. Even though, yes, some seem to be veiling themselves in some way to escape the fear factor, often with emphasis on anarchist elements as you say, that doesn't solve the issue. You're all potential friends, and I just want peace between us.