Not that I disagree but how is tiktok doing it?

I mean maybe she just looked at Candace Owens and figured that was a viable career path.

I think peoples view that the increasingly partisan media has political aims is causing them to forget these are companies.

They are making money (or trying) and they will say or do whatever furthers that aim. They are not out for the public good, they can't be.

If you want proof just look at CNN and their waffling in the last 10 years as they try to both sides shit so as to not lose increasingly shrinking cable news subscribers.

People more readily appreciate things that obviously directly affect them.

I think a good comparison is Bell Labs and AT&T. A lot of good work was done by Bell Labs but it was mostly enabled by AT&Ts monopoly.

There are more rolling release distributions like tumbleweed.

I use endeavour because I like Arch but don't need to be bothered installing it the arch way more than once.

Plenty of people are benefiting you just don't see it because it's internal.

The incentives are such that new thing is better and looks better on your year end goals.

Plus when an org gets large enough and siloed enough the left hand rarely knows what the right hand is doing.

Everytime I read a bill with a moniker like this I'm immediately sceptical

Good. People can wait a few days to get their packages if it means better working conditions.

They should set up a mastodon instance like the BBC if they have not already.

Probably should put some push bars on those ambulances and give them permission to get things out of the way.

Though it should be noted the root cause of the issue is car first infrastructure which likely contributed to the accident to begin with.

Half the time it would just be a Sysco product list.