[-] trias10@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

He's been doing nothing but roids the last few years, the transformation has been pretty crazy.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I'm with Amazon on this, seems a reasonable ask for employees to not wear any political/cultural/social things at work with their official uniform.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I have spoken to a few Republicans, and they just don't see any of it as treason. In their minds, Democrats being elected in any office would lead to the country being destroyed, so any sort of coup is actually saving the country, it's patriotism, not treason. It's basically the Franco mindset.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Hope the driver goes to jail.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Capitalist/free market* economists.

Rent control works just fine in a more socialist model, especially when the government is a prime builder of housing without seeking profit, as almost every European country was during the 50s-70s. It's only when government gets out of house building and everything gets privatisated and for-profit that rent control fails.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Is it possible to eat those humans? If it's actually nutritious I don't see a problem, and it's less wasteful, as you said. Soylent Green operated on this principle.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Am not defending this law at all, but the thinking behind it is twofold:

  1. you might be handing out tainted or expired food
  2. the bigger issue: you are creating a "nuisance" on the property where you're doing it, as large groups of homeless people gather there. Some would say it's a safety concern, for example handing out free food at the corner of a primary school.

Again, I'm not agreeing with either point, but these are arguments I have heard from people who back such laws.

To the second point though, I've seen it firsthand. Salt Lake City tried to do a good thing by making the public library a homeless-friendly zone by handing out free food and allowing access to WiFi. This caused a large amount of homeless to hang out there all the time, and some of them would harass and attack non-homeless patrons of the library to the point that pretty much all of them stopped coming to the library entirely, and the area became a no-go zone.

The real issue is that a large amount of homeless people have severe mental illnesses (since public sanitariums all closed in the 70s). So where there are big congregations of homeless, there will inevitably be harassment and possible violence. Cities don't want people feeding the homeless at any old public building to avoid these situations, hence the laws, which allow you to do it only at certain places the city allows.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

So a small group of workers should suffer because the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few?

Those rail workers weren't striking for higher pay, they wanted the basic human dignity of having paid time off and paid sick days.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

I actually did know that, but it doesn't invalidate my point whatsoever.

If Democrats were truly supportive of working class people they wouldn't be voting to remove their collective bargaining rights via an act of Congress. Think about that for a second -- they would rather vote to send those workers to jail than allow them to exercise a core right of workers everywhere.

Doesn't matter that Biden stepped in months later, Biden is the president and I'm talking about the general party in Congress, e.g. Democrats en masse.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Democrats and Republicans came together in a super rare and bipartisan endeavour to shut down the rights of hard working railroad workers trying to strike for sick days and time off in December 2022. The final senate vote was 85 vs 15.

That should be a pretty clear indication that at least when it comes to helping working class people where it counts (money and basic human rights), both parties are identical.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Absolutely, I'm gobsmacked nobody seems to read history.

Although, a lot of these nowadays fascist leaders are being supported by very large swathes of their own populations, as much as 48%, which is the truly shocking thing.

[-] trias10@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago

I think this article misses the forest for the trees. The real "evil" here is capitalism, not AI. Capitalism encourages a race towards optimality with no care to what happens to workers. Just like the invention of the car put carriage makers out of business, so AI will be used to by company owners to cut costs if it serves them. It has been like this for over a 100 years, AI is just the latest technology to come along. I'm old enough to remember tons of these same doom and gloom articles about workers losing their jobs when the internet revolution hit in the late 90s. And probably many people did lose jobs, but many new jobs were created too.

view more: next ›

trias10

joined 1 year ago