I don't think we're past all the climate tipping points; that'd start to cause runaway changes. Swift action right now would still provide a chance to lessen the impact.
The worst case scenarios would be truly disastrous though, and would cause secondary human conflicts due to unavailability of basic resources.
And now even plans to do AI-generated ads:
Netflix plans to use generative AI to create ads for its ad-support Netflix subscription
It has to be Tesla that's liable I guess, when there's no safety driver. Although I didn't find any good example of a legal precedent in such cases.
The video has a link to all the sources used for it:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fifRcyUFtlKNvd8sVH_IU2iE1bpgxhDWqVVFcGmVyYY/edit?usp=drivesdk
There was too little rain this year which made the fires much worse.
I fail to understand why they stick with fossil fuels even though renewable deployments are cheaper than ever. Although there's misinformation and politics, they should look at long term profits..
HW3 owners can now expect “a much updated v12.6.”
It's crazy how they left HW3 and below cars abandoned. Tesla's promises are worthless.
Damn it looks even more likely as per this article:
At the moment, there is a major obstacle to Musk’s self-driving ambitions: Federal regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have been hesitant to lay out a path for approving the next generation of robotic vehicles.
But with Musk now firmly in Trump’s inner circle, the billionaire is in a stronger position to influence development of federal rules that would put more of the cars on the road — an approach he proposed in a recent call with financial analysts.
Isn't Waymo and others doing this as well? They do much more simulated training than real-world data to scale up use cases.
The article makes it seem only Chinese AVs are doing it