womjunru

joined 1 day ago
[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 4 points 23 minutes ago

Are you telling me that you don’t open a water bottle with your eyelids? Not even to impress the ladies?

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago

I feel the guardrails are in place, and that they will be continuously improved. If a person finds a situation where an AI suggests they kill themselves without being prompted, say, during a brainstorm about strawberry cake consistency—if you were dead you wouldn’t have this problem—would be… concerning.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 hour ago

Haha. Vote for Elon!

/s

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Okay so it has guardrails already. Make them better. Government regulations can’t be specific enough for the daily changing AI environment.

I’d say AI has a lot more self regulation than social media.

But, I run ai on bare metal at home. This isn’t chatGPT. And it will, in theory, do anything I want it to. Would you tell me that I can’t roll my own mania machine? Get out of my house lol.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago

It will give you whatever you want. Just like social media and google searches. The information exists.

When you tell it to give you information in a way you want to hear it, you’re just talking to yourself at that point.

People should probably avoid giving it prompts that fuel their mania. However, since mania is totally subjective and the topics range broadly, what does an actual regulation look like?

What do you use AI for?

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

So what kind of regulations would be put in place to prevent people from using ai to feed their mania?

I’m open to the idea, but I think it’s such a broad concept at this point that implementation and regulation would be impossible.

If you want to go down the guns don’t kill people assumption, fine: social media kills more people and does more damage and should be shut down long before AI. 🤷‍♂️

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 hours ago

Just stop shipping to the US

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t want to restrict any of those things including AI, what are you talking about?

Look, it is very clear that you aren’t interested in reading you were just interested in screaming so I’m not wasting my time on you. Thiswill be my last comment feel free to continue on your own

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

You are creating a conversation that does not exist. I don’t have concerns about not banning kitchen knives? I’m comparing tools to tools and you are turning a conversation to something you feel like screaming and yelling about because this is the dopamine time for you.

I will not speak to someone who puts words in my mouth, and doesn’t use their ears.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I think that more effective regulation would be on social media

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

I never used the word epidemic. I don’t believe the article use the word epidemic.

If we want to talk about things that are more damaging to People, let’s talk about social media. That is exponentially more damaging than AI.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe -2 points 3 hours ago (7 children)

Since when is this an epidemic?

view more: next ›